Assessing Actions and Outcomes in Contemporary Central-Eastern Europe
Edited By Jacek Kurczewski
Reconciliation in the Bloodlands – Concluding Remarks
← 334 | 335 → Reconciliation in the Bloodlands – Concluding Remarks
The last paragraph of the preceding chapter points to the necessity of permanent vigil concerning the state of mutual relations between people. It is certain that once antagonism had been detected or was manifested publicly it needs to be monitored continuously. One never can be certain that reconciliation had been achieved forever. In fact three levels of social reconciliation should be distinguished: (1) the state of mutual isolation in which still throughout the 19th century most of the Central Eastern European communities lived. Here, the different collectivities live side by side not maintaining personal relations and leading closed community life usually focused on temple or church. From time to time the pogrom occurs as the temporary lifting the lid from boiling hatred and disdain for the weaker others. (2) Second stage is that of the mutual tolerance linked with everyday cooperation in the mundane matters. Here each individual is allowed to choose own community of allegiance and to practice its patterns tolerated in this by the others of different loyalty. Some common good is needed to keep such community of tolerance working, at least communal sewage system if not at the advanced level of integration schooling or health. (3) The advanced integration in the end may lead to the so-called active tolerance, that is support for the differences. This is more demanding social ideal and it is somewhat risky as in the end the differences may disappear though they will remain on the common fusion menu. That however would mean...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.