Emotion, Expression, Explanation
Edited By András Benedek and Kristof Nyiri
Trace, Writing, Diagram: Reflections on Spatiality, Intuition, Graphical Practices and Thinking
If there is a crucial dichotomy in the human sciences, it is that between word and image, between representation and presentation, between the discursive and iconic forms of the symbolic. Our speaking of a “linguistic” turn or an “iconic” or “pictorial” turn confirms and strengthens this conceptual dichotomy. However there exists a sizable class of representational tools which challenge this binary ordering of the symbolic: consider writing, tables, graphs, diagrams or maps. They arise as a conjunction of language and image; let us call this class the “diagrammatic”. Diagrammatics’ smallest common denominator arises from the interaction between point, line and plane. “Saying” and “showing” work together in the diagrammatic to create an “operative iconicity”.1 These graphical representations open up a field of both aesthetic and epistemic experience. They are not only a medium for the representation of the objects of knowledge, but also at the same time an instrument through which those very objects can be generated and explored. Knowledge is not only represented, transmitted and disseminated through the diagrammatic; it is produced and expanded by it.
This paper will describe the role that the diagrammatic plays for thinking and understanding, and how it realizes its part. Our assumption is that the cognitive function associated with the diagrammatic exists in order to allow imperceptible theoretical objects to become visible and tactile. Intuition – what Kant calls “Anschauung” – and thought become so closely tied in the diagrammatic, that it allows us to undertake the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.