Show Less
Restricted access

Literalität und Partizipation

Über schriftsprachliche Voraussetzungen demokratischer Teilhabe

Series:

Edited By Demokratie-Stiftung der

Die Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität zu Köln veranstaltete im März 2012 in Kooperation mit der Demokratie-Stiftung eine internationale Fachtagung zum Thema Literalität und Partizipation, um einen aktiven Austausch verschiedener Akteure der (politischen) Grundbildung und ihrer Perspektiven zu ermöglichen. Das Anliegen der Veranstaltung war, die Bedeutung schriftsprachlicher Grundbildung für die aktive Teilhabe am gesellschaftlich-demokratischen Prozess herauszuarbeiten. Migration und kulturelle Heterogenität wurden mit Blick auf das herrschende Verständnis von Grundbildung und ziviler Teilhabekompetenz reflektiert. Hierauf folgte die Erörterung von Zielfiguren und didaktischen Konsequenzen für die politische Bildung.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Einführung in die Tagung

Extract



Professor Dr. Klaus Künzel,Institut für Bildungsphilosophie, Anthropologie und Pädagogik der Lebensspanne an der Universität zu Köln

Ladies and gentlemen, it is my pleasure to welcome you to our international conference on literacy and participation. The title we have chosen is one which I believe is not only of contemporary academic interest but which reflects a growing concern about the social and human costs of educational deprivation and exclusion. Although our meeting’s main attention will be focussed on whether basic standards of reading and writing are indispensible requirements for democratic participation, its wider social implications should not be overlooked.

Generally speaking, the relationship between literacy and individual abilities to care about and take part in public affairs is characterized by the human capacity to apply – and profit from – basic techniques of communication. Expressive skills such as rhetorics and the art of wording can be regarded as indispensible ingredients of interactive competence, and no person seems to be more dependent on its refinement and situational appropriateness than the professional politician. Such qualities are by and large conditioned by the strategic objectives of the spoken word as it is directed towards and received by public audiences. But is the welfare and strength of democratic orders sufficiently provided for by political mechanisms which are primarily founded in the tradition of oral interaction? I think not.

My scepticism is founded on at least two observations. First: Political communication designed to address...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.