Show Less
Restricted access

Common or Divided Security?

German and Norwegian Perspectives on Euro-Atlantic Security

Edited By Robin Allers, Carlo Masala and Rolf Tamnes

Twenty-five years after the end of the Cold War, Euro-Atlantic security is under pressure. Faced with major geopolitical shifts, instability at its frontiers and financial crisis at home, the European nations and their American Allies will have to rethink how to design common security. Failure to animate the European Union (EU) and to reinvigorate the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) as efficient tools for peace and security might lead the West back to the spectre of divided security, to fragmentation and renationalisation. This book addresses the main challenges to Western security from the perspective of two European Allies: Germany and Norway.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Chapter 2: Norwegian Foreign and Security Policy: From the Arctic Frontier to the Afghan Battlefield

← 46 | 47 → Chapter 2

Extract

Norwegian Foreign and Security Policy:From the Arctic Frontier to the Afghan Battlefield

Rolf Tamnes

The main task of any nation is to protect its sovereignty and core values, to safeguard its economic interests, and to promote its political aspirations. No nation’s security, interests and ambitions can be lastingly achieved in isolation but only in cooperation with other nations and institutions. As a small power with extensive global economic and political activities and interests, Norway is particularly prone to work for a robust rule-based international order that can enhance peace and stability and protect against encroachment and discrimination. In a world of anarchy, however, Norway cannot base its security solely on international rules and regimes, so a second line of defence is to maintain national military capabilities and to pin down Western powers to the defence of Norway.

In order to capture the essence of these ambitions and tasks, I shall examine four dimensions of Norwegian foreign and security policy: the High North or the European Arctic, the transatlantic, the European and the global dimensions.1 This four-dimensional approach is a fruitful analytical tool for capturing Norwegian policy in the 20th century as well as today. In discussing the four dimensions, I shall address the weighting between continuity versus change and the balancing act between internationalism versus aloofness. My analysis of Norwegian foreign and security policy will emphasise a strong continuity in position and strategy: while the many upheavals and catastrophes of the 20th century...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.