CHAPTER II: All of James’s Biographers
← 32 | 33 → CHAPTER IIAll of James’s Biographers
In spite of the doubts concerning biography as a genre, presented in the previous chapter, I acknowledge the possibility of a contract between the author and the reader, which – as an analogy to Lejeune’s concept – I would like to call a “biographical pact.” Perhaps it would be more appropriate in fact to reconceptualize it as a “biographical p/act,” introducing a slash in order to emphasize the presence of an “act” in the “pact.” The most visible sign of the biographical pact or agreement is – just as in the case of “autobiographical pacts” – the presence on the title page of two names: that of the biographer and that of the biographee. The history of constructing Henry James’s biography is an excellent example of legal claims as part and parcel of all attempts at constructing literary history, including accounts of authors’ lives. The biography genre may become (and in the case of James it actually became as soon as he died, or even before) a battlefield, the place of struggle for power and for the exclusive possession of complete knowledge about him. For decades, one biography of Henry James has dominated both popular and academic discourse. There have been attempts to re-interpret some episodes of his life, but even today no biographer can afford to overlook Leon Edel’s monumental work, which consists mainly of five bulky volumes of biographies published in the years 1953–1972,1 as well as a two-volume biography of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.