The Musical Rhetoric of the Polish Baroque
Chapter 6 Musical Rhetoricians
Our analysis has to include the individual achievements of composers. On one hand, text-interpretative figures were a universally valid convention that, in many aspects, had a common denominator; but on the other hand, they did not constitute a static “collection” of ideas and shapes that composers employed mechanically. Such a mechanical approach did happen, but at the same time, there existed multiple individual tendencies and interpretative preferences, stemming from a large number of factors: historical time, genre preferences, compositional technique, style, instrumental cast, relationship between tradition and modernity, and of course, the ability and talent of the composer. In synthetic sketches of the oratorial profiles of our leading composers, our endeavour will be to present both the reflection of the universal parameters of musical rhetoric and the more objective assessment of the object, defining its place within a broad historical panorama, and distinctive individual phenomena, individual compositional choices; we will also explore any particularly interesting and artistically successful solutions and novelties.
Our analysis shall focus on those composers who are relevant to the latter premise: leading authors who left a relatively sizeable output, allowing to the formulation of more general conclusions. They include Zieleński, Lilius, Mielczewski, Pękiel, Różycki, Stachowicz, Szarzyński, and Gorczycki. Second-tier composers, however—such as Kobierkowicz, Krener, Leszczyński, Jezierski, and some other authors of high artistic level but who left a limited amount of works (Wronowicz, Maxylewicz) or nearly exclusively instrumental works (Jarzębski)—will not be discussed in...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.