Perspectives of Interdisciplinary Comparative Literature- Translated by Lindsay Davidson
Interdisciplinarity and Comparative Studies
I. Introductory Remarks
The dispute about interdisciplinarity – of interest to us in direct connection with the problems of recent comparative studies and more broadly: with the problems of modern literary criticism and cultural studies – in today’s world reaches, practically speaking, into every area of reflection and every aspect of scientific research218. It could most simply be said that interdisciplinarity as a contemporary phenomenon comes down to, firstly, the issue of knowledge and perception of the world, and secondly, as a consequence, to the “economy” of knowledge and, ultimately, a form of power219. In the case of looking at the widest circle of issues in two indicated ways, namely in epistemological and sociological aspects, not without reason one should consider becoming acquainted with the various phenomena (including literature as one of the discourses and one of the elements of cultural reality) and be aware of the existence – as suggested recently in an interview with Vincent B. Leitch – of the “era of interdisciplinarity”220. ← 67 | 68 →
Undoubtedly, in the current dispute about interdisciplinarity, which inevitably places the question of the status and boundaries of individual academic disciplines221 at the centre of attention, there is no lack of supporters or opponents. All the criticism formulated in connection with the idea of interdisciplinarity can either be reduced to the moderated thesis that there is no such discipline, which would be completely autonomous and completely isolated from the others (this is, for example, an argument of Giovanni Gozzer222, a...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.