De Ira has long been considered a standard Stoic approach to anger in dialogue form, its structure more closely approximates that of an epistle. The prevalence of legal terminology as well as numerous and recurrent legal contexts suggest that Seneca used the Epistolary
Responsum of the jurisconsults as his model instead of the philosophical dialogue. Seneca’s criticism of the delict
Iniuria in a legal genre disguised as a Stoic moral essay parodies the
Responsum and, as a consequence, effectively reveals law as a convenient pretext and source of a social ill it purports to remedy.