Loading...

On the Persistence of Relationship Banking within a Bank-Based Financial System

Post-Crisis Evidence from German SMEs

by Katharina Sauter (Author)
©2020 Thesis 352 Pages

Summary

The overall financial market environment has undergone a dramatic shift in the past few years as a result of the recent global financial crisis, associated regulatory changes, and new market participants. This study undertook an online survey of 12,169 SMEs from all major sectors of the German economy. A total of 576 completed and usable questionnaires were collected. The aim of this study is to explore the nature of lending relationships in light of the past financial crisis, the resultant structural changes, and the competition of new entrants into the financial system. The study shows that relationship lending is essential for ensuring financial market stability.

Table Of Contents

  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • About the author
  • About the book
  • Citability of the eBook
  • Overview
  • Table of contents
  • List of figures
  • List of tables
  • List of abbreviations
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 The importance and relevance of relationship banking
  • 1.2 Thesis structure
  • 2 Theoretical foundations
  • 2.1 Principal-agent theory
  • 2.1.1 Principal-agent conflict
  • 2.1.2 Conflicts of interest, information asymmetries, and the resulting risks
  • 2.1.3 Instruments to reduce risk and governance systems
  • 2.2 Financial intermediation in the context of principal-agent theory
  • 2.2.1 The theory of financial intermediation
  • 2.2.2 The role of banks
  • 2.2.3 Incentive problems in bank lending
  • 2.3 Characteristics of market- and bank-based financial systems
  • 2.3.1 Market-based financial systems
  • 2.3.2 Bank-based financial systems
  • 2.3.3 Key differences between market- and bank-based financial systems
  • 2.4 Relationship lending versus arm’s-length lending
  • 2.4.1 Arm’s-length lending
  • 2.4.2 Relationship lending
  • 2.5 The German banking system and disruptive changes
  • 2.5.1 The current transformation of the German banking system
  • 2.5.2 Development of corporate financing of non-financial companies
  • 2.5.3 Regulatory consequences of the 2007–2009 financial crisis
  • 2.5.4 New market entrants into the financial and banking system
  • 2.6 SMEs and family firms
  • 2.6.1 Definition of family firms
  • 2.6.2 Performance of family firms
  • 2.6.3 Financing of family firms
  • 2.7 Deriving the research model on relationship banking
  • 2.7.1 Literature review on the economic costs and benefits of relationship banking
  • 2.7.2 Evidence from market-based financial systems
  • 2.7.2.1 Loan characteristics
  • Scope and finance share
  • 2.7.2.2 Relationship characteristics
  • Information asymmetries and trust and loan officers
  • Number of bank lending relationships
  • Duration of lending relationship
  • Financial distress
  • 2.7.2.3 Firm characteristics
  • 2.7.2.4 Control variables
  • 2.7.3 Evidence from bank-based financial systems
  • 2.7.3.1 Loan characteristics
  • Scope and finance share
  • 2.7.3.2 Relationship characteristics
  • Information asymmetries, trust and loan officers
  • Number of lending relationships
  • Duration of lending relationship
  • Bank type and distance
  • Financial distress
  • 2.7.3.3 Firm characteristics
  • 2.7.3.4 Control variables
  • 2.7.4 Differences between market- and bank-based financial systems
  • 2.7.5 Summary of empirical findings
  • 2.8 Deriving the hypotheses based on the research model on relationship banking
  • 2.8.1 Determinants of bank relationships
  • Country
  • Firms
  • Banks
  • 2.8.2 Characteristics of bank relationships
  • Loan characteristics
  • Relationship characteristics
  • Firm characteristics
  • 3 Data and methodology
  • 3.1 Data collection methods
  • 3.2 Sample design, pretest, and data collection
  • 3.3 Survey design
  • 3.4 Endogenous variables
  • Collateral Requirements
  • Cost of Debt
  • Credit Availability
  • 3.5 Exogenous variables
  • Loan characteristics
  • Relationship characteristics
  • Firm characteristics
  • Control variables
  • 3.6 Analytical methods
  • 3.6.1 Ordinary least squares
  • 3.6.2 The assumptions underlying the least squares method
  • 3.6.3 The logit model
  • 3.6.4 The probit model
  • 3.7 Robustness tests of data
  • 4 Empirical evaluation
  • 4.1 Descriptive statistics
  • 4.1.1 Firm characteristics and control variables
  • 4.1.2 Loan characteristics
  • 4.1.3 Endogenous variables
  • 4.1.4 Relationship characteristics
  • 4.1.5 Family firms versus non-family firms
  • 4.2 Multivariate analyses
  • 4.2.1 Full sample - Collateral requirements
  • 4.2.2 Full sample - Collateral type
  • 4.2.3 Full sample - Cost of debt
  • 4.2.4 Full sample - Credit availability
  • 4.2.5 Family versus non-family firms - Collateral requirements
  • 4.2.6 Family firms versus non-family firms - Cost of debt
  • 4.2.7 Family firms versus non-family firms - Credit availability
  • 5 Concluding remarks
  • 5.1 Summary and discussion of the main results
  • 5.2 Limitations and avenues for future research
  • 6 References
  • Appendix

List of tables

Table 2-1: Incentive problems in the principal-agent relationship

Table 2-2: Structure of outstanding liabilities of non-financial corporations in Germany

Table 2-3: Number of bank branches in Germany compared to the previous year

Table 2-4: Top 10 German banks by balance sheet total for the financial years 2015 and 2016

Table 2-5: Distribution of studies

Table 2-6: Panel A – Collateral requirements, Panel B – Cost of debt, Panel C – Credit availability

Table 2-7: Number of bank relationships in market- versus bank-based financial systems

Table 2-8: Duration of bank relationships in market- versus bank-based financial systems

Table 3-1: Definition of endogenous and exogenous variables

Table 3-2: Overview of analytical methods

Table 3-3: Values of cumulative probability functions

Table 4-1: Summary of firm, loan, and relationship characteristics

Table 4-2: Number of banks according to average firm size, age, and finance share

Table 4-3: Overview of variables of family firms versus non-family firms

Table 4-4: Differences between family firms and non-family firms

Table 4-5: Probit regression – Full sample – Collateral requirements

Table 4-6: Probit regression – Full sample – Personal guarantees

Table 4-7: Ordinary least squares – Full sample – Cost of debt

Table 4-8: Probit regression – Full sample – Credit availability

Table 4-9: Probit regression – Family firm versus non-family firm sample – Collateral requirements

Table 4-10: Ordinary least squares – Family firm versus non-family firm sample – Cost of debt

Table 4-11: Probit regression – Family firm versus non-family firm sample – Credit availability

Table 5-1: Overview of confirmed and rejected hypotheses

Table 5-2: Matrix - Variables for bank lending terms and conditions

Table A-1: Correlation matrix – Spearman

Table A-2: Correlation matrix – Pearson

Table A-3: Correlation matrix – Kendall’s tau

Table A-4: Probit regression – Full sample – Collateral requirements with family firm variable

Table A-5: Ordinary least squares – Full sample – Cost of debt with family firm variable

Table A-6: Probit regression – Full sample – Credit availability with family firm variable

1 Introduction

1.1 The importance and relevance of relationship banking

In recent years, the world has witnessed a rapid restructuring of the financial market and banking landscape, primarily due to the 2007-2009 worldwide financial crisis and the subsequent increase in competition. Banks are under pressure from declining profits, and many are struggling with high amounts of non-performing, or “distressed,” loans. In some Southern European countries, the share of non-performing loans in certain bank portfolios is more than 45 %. Such distressed loans were one of the primary causes of the global financial crisis (Tauber 2017). Policymakers have ratcheted up the pressure on banks to reduce the number of distressed loans in their portfolios in an effort to prevent future crises. In addition to the regulatory consolidation through the Basel Accords, e.g., the implementation of leverage ratio requirements in 2013, banks are expected to take further action to reduce the risk of their day-to-day business activities (Bank for International Settlements 2014).

“In the aftermath of the recent financial crisis, many banks became either unwilling or unable to provide financing to companies. […] This development is especially striking given the traditionally close financing relationships between German corporations and banks” (Mietzner, Schweizer, and Proelss 2018, p. 375). Moreover, corporations tried to reduce their need for bank loans in the post-crisis period (Davis and Stone 2004; Deutsche Bundesbank 2012; Nassr and Wehinger 2015). As a result of these developments, German financing methods underwent some radical shifts, particularly with respect to external financing, which was much more volatile than internal financing after the crisis.

Generally, the ratio between internal and external financing has varied sharply over time. While in the past banks were the main lenders, they have gradually lost some luster in favor of other creditors such as affiliated companies (Deutsche Bundesbank 2012; European Central Bank 2017a, 2017b). During economic downturns, companies typically resort to bank financing. Likewise, this change is also related to bank supply-side factors, such as stricter credit standards during economic downturns, and rising regulatory requirements, which have increased the relevance of alternative funding sources. The significance of bank loans, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), decreased. However, bank loans still represent the single most important source of external financing, despite the fact that their overall intermediation services through traditional credit business has declined (Deutsche Bundesbank 2012).

Details

Pages
352
Year
2020
ISBN (PDF)
9783631804773
ISBN (ePUB)
9783631804780
ISBN (MOBI)
9783631804797
ISBN (Hardcover)
9783631802687
DOI
10.3726/b16252
Language
English
Publication date
2019 (November)
Keywords
Relationship lending Housebank Financial crisis Financial system Family firms SMEs Market stability
Published
Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien, 2020. 352 pp., 22 fig. b/w, 30 tables.

Biographical notes

Katharina Sauter (Author)

Katharina Sauter studied Corporate Management and Economics at Zeppelin University. She then pursued a part-time PhD program with a large accountancy firm and completed her PhD on relationship banking at the chair of «Banking and Finance» at Zeppelin University.

Previous

Title: On the Persistence of Relationship Banking within a Bank-Based Financial System
book preview page numper 1
book preview page numper 2
book preview page numper 3
book preview page numper 4
book preview page numper 5
book preview page numper 6
book preview page numper 7
book preview page numper 8
book preview page numper 9
book preview page numper 10
book preview page numper 11
book preview page numper 12
book preview page numper 13
book preview page numper 14
book preview page numper 15
book preview page numper 16
book preview page numper 17
book preview page numper 18
book preview page numper 19
book preview page numper 20
book preview page numper 21
book preview page numper 22
book preview page numper 23
book preview page numper 24
book preview page numper 25
book preview page numper 26
book preview page numper 27
book preview page numper 28
book preview page numper 29
book preview page numper 30
book preview page numper 31
book preview page numper 32
book preview page numper 33
book preview page numper 34
book preview page numper 35
book preview page numper 36
book preview page numper 37
book preview page numper 38
book preview page numper 39
book preview page numper 40
354 pages