Loading...

Contemporary Studies and Theories in Gastronomy and Food Science

by İrfan Yazicioğlu (Volume editor) Özgür Yayla (Volume editor) Alper Işın (Volume editor) Fuat Bayram (Volume editor) Eren Yalçın (Volume editor)
©2025 Edited Collection 428 Pages

Summary

This collection presents scholarly investigations centred around gastronomy and hospitality within the tourism sector. This volume aims to contribute both theoretically and practically to the academic community and industry professionals alike. By highlighting the pivotal role of gastronomy and food in tourism, it underscores their significance and implications across various facets of the field. The book integrates conceptual studies with practical examples of hospitality applications, enriching the discourse and fostering a deeper understanding of these interconnected disciplines.

Table Of Contents

  • Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • About the author
  • About the book
  • This eBook can be cited
  • Table of Contents
  • Chapter 1 Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Handlers and Managers Working in Chain Food and Beverage Business in Turkey (Ecem Akay and Ilkay Yilmaz)
  • Chapter 2 The Use of Food in Children’s Books: A Review (Fatma Koç)
  • Chapter 3 An Organic Transformation Story: Değirmen Farm (Ahu Sezgin)
  • Chapter 4 Evaluation of Bursa’s Geographically Indicated Food Products within the Scope of Gastronomy Tourism (Ayhan Dağdeviren and Yusuf Ziya Akbaş)
  • Chapter 5 The Emergence of New Culinary Movements (Maksut Özkeşkek)
  • Chapter 6 Cultural Heritage in Gastronomy (Zuhal Özdemir Yaman and Büşra Yeşilyurt Sağdiç)
  • Chapter 7 Journey to Chocolate (Sena Ekinci and Nevzat Emrah Özçelik)
  • Chapter 8 General Characteristics and Historical Processes of Turkish Cuisine (Gökhan Şalli and Sercan Kadam)
  • Chapter 9 Phygitalization in Gastronomy (Betül Öztürk, Didem Tiraş, and Karahan Kara)
  • Chapter 10 Reintroduction of Sprouts and Microgreens to the Gastronomy World (Erdi Eren and Aybuke Ceyhun Sezgin)
  • Chapter 11 Tourist Typology and Memorable Gastronomic Experience (Seda Yilmaz)
  • Chapter 12 The Effect of Gastronomy Trends on Accommodation Preferences; Therapeutic Nutrition Tendency in Tourism Behavior (Hilal Kul)
  • Chapter 13 Comparison of Turkish-Iranian Dishes in the 15th Century (Nazanin Nikeghbal and Hilmi Rafet Yüncü)
  • Chapter 14 Plant-based Menus: A New Trend for Restaurants (Esra Dogu Baykut)
  • Chapter 15 Digital Nomads as Culinary Ambassadors (Önder Yayla and Şeyda Yayla)
  • Chapter 16 Artificial Meat as a Gastronomic Element (Berrin Güzel and Ilgaz Feray Demirağ)
  • Chapter 17 Waste-Free Kitchen Management in Gastronomy (Vedat Kayiş and Atif Akkil)
  • Chapter 18 Surimi as a Gastronomic Value: A Scientific Review of Gastronomy, Origin, and Technology (Ali Şen)
  • Chapter 19 The Deep Roots of Coffee Culture/A Tasting Journey Around the World (Mustafa Yilmaz)
  • Chapter 20 Alternative Protein Sources for Individuals on a Vegan Diet; Meat Analogs (Sibel Ayyildiz and Ayşe Nur Uslu)
  • Chapter 21 Geographical Indications and Gastronomic Value Sustainability: Sherbets (Sevil Atalay Tohumcu and Gencay Saatci Savsa)
  • Chapter 22 The Meeting Point of Flavors: Gastronomy Festivals (Irfan Yurt)
  • Chapter 23 Intangible Cultural Aspects of the Gastronomic Product (Ibrahim Çekiç)
  • Chapter 24 The Effects of Tablecloth Selection on Consumer Feelings in Gastronomy (Çağlar Bayar)
  • Chapter 25 Storytelling as a Marketing Tool in Gastronomy Tourism (Özge Adan Gök and Ceren Miral Çavdirli)
  • Chapter 26 Introduction to Pastry Making: History, Classification, Education, and Pastry Making Practices (Eda Güneş and Doğukan Bayesen)
  • Chapter 27 Gastronomy Photography (Mehmet Fatih Kayran)
  • Chapter 28 Gastronomy Museum (S. Ceylin Şanli Kayran)
  • Chapter 29 Gastronomic Tourism Products within the Scope of Intangible Cultural Heritage (Çağri Sürücü)
  • Chapter 30 Taste and Flavor Perception (Elif Zeynep Özer and Alper Çevik)
  • Chapter 31 The Role of Mass Nutrition Systems in Food Allergen Management (Emel Kaynakci and Irem Serra Pekşen)
  • Chapter 32 Evaluation of Gastronomic Elements of Railway Travel Routes in Turkey (Ayşen Ertaş Sabanci and Ekin Akbulut)
  • Chapter 33 Sensory Analysis and Consumer Perception in Gastronomy (Sena Bakir and Ayşe Gülnihal Altin)
  • Chapter 34 Evaluation of Viticulture in Northern Cyprus in Terms of Gastronomy Tourism (Soner Özyalçin and Mete Ünal Girgen)
  • Chapter 35 A Qualitative Study on the Implementation of the Cross-age Peer Tutoring Model in Culinary Lessons (Beysun Güneri and V. Rüya Ehtiyar)

Ecem Akay1 and Ilkay Yilmaz2

Chapter 1 Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Handlers and Managers Working in Chain Food and Beverage Business in Turkey

Introduction

With the changing life conditions and developing technology, especially women’s being more active in business life and the fact that eating is now a form of communication causes the rapid increase in mass consumption places and the fact that businesses producing food products become chains and serve in different locations day by day. Chain businesses are advantageous in that they are managed from a single center and that all products produced are structured over standard recipes. Standardization is very important as chain businesses are businesses that can be in different cities and locations, as well as outside the country.

This study aims to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the employees in these businesses in Istanbul, which is the headquarters of most chain food and beverage companies in Turkey, about allergenic foods that are required to be notified. In addition, how food allergy management is carried out is to examine the actions taken by the business.

Material and Methods Research Design and Participants

In the quantitative part of this research, the sample is; It consists of 384 people working in chain food and beverage businesses affiliated with the center of Istanbul. Istanbul is the most populated city in Turkey. In this context, a questionnaire was applied to kitchen chefs and kitchen staff, service department staff, and branch managers working in chain businesses. Ethical permission was obtained from Ayvansaray University Ethics Committee, numbered E-31675095-100-2100001336, for the research conducted between June and October 2020.

This study was designed as mixed-method research. The process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative data together to understand the research problem in research or a series of research is expressed as a mixed-method (Cresswell & Clark, 2011).

In the quantitative part of the study, the descriptive survey method was used, which aims to show a situation as it is without trying to influence it (Büyüköztürk et al., 2016). It was aimed to determine the knowledge level of the participants on current food safety and hygiene through the descriptive survey method. A descriptive survey is a qualitative approach in which the researcher presents a situation description by collecting detailed and comprehensive information about one or more situations (Cresswell, 2016).

Data Analysis

In the analysis of quantitative data, descriptive statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V.21 (IBM, IL, USA) and the arithmetic mean standard deviation, and percentages (%) of the obtained data were calculated (Büyüköztürk, 2016). For knowledge questions, the percentage of correct answers given to each knowledge question is given. Attitude questions, on the other hand, were converted into a score that determines the attitudes of the participants, since there is no right or wrong answer for each item since it is subjective. By taking the average of the answers given to each item, a general level of attitude about that participant’s food allergy was determined. Similarly, the person’s knowledge level was expressed with a single variable by giving 1 point to each person’s correct answers and 0 points to their incorrect answers, and adding these points. The mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values of these “knowledge” and “attitude” scores are given. In addition, the Cronbach’s Alpha values of these variables, that is, the reliability coefficients, are stated. Participants’ gender, age, educational background, etc. The independent sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance tested whether all other demographic data differed according to the knowledge and attitude levels of the participants. The pairwise comparison of the groups with the findings that were significant in ANOVA was made with the Scheffe test, known as the post-hoc test. After the comparison analysis, the relationship between knowledge and attitude levels was tested with correlation analysis. Findings with a p-value <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Analysis of Quantitative Data

Table 1.1. The Percentage of Correct Answers of Each Information Proposition Directed to the Participants
Items (T) True, (F) False Frequency(n) (%)
A food allergy is an abnormal response of the immune system to ordinarily harmless food or an ingredient in a food. 297 77.3
Lactose into Lactose and milk and dairy products are the same concept.* 101 26.3
Food allergy is caused by the proteins found in foods. 165 43.0
Food Allergy is a reaction after the food is digested in the body. 62 16.1
Food Allergy can even result in death, depending on the sensitivity of the person. 340 88.5
According to the Turkish Food Codex Labeling regulation, the ingredients that cause allergies are shown on the food packaging labels. 316 82.3
According to the Turkish Food Codex Labeling regulation, allergen components are shown on the menus. 294 76.6
As a result of cooking processes performed at high temperatures (deep frying, oven frying, etc.), allergens in the food are destroyed.* 261 68.0
If a person with an allergic reaction consumes large amounts of cold water, the existing reaction will be alleviated.* 157 40.9
When preparing meals with products containing allergens, different tools and equipment should be used. 319 83.1
While preparing a food allergy-safe meal, other non-allergenic foods may be touched with the same glove.* 269 70.1
Factors in allergenic foods can be destroyed if the products are cooked at high temperatures or stored in the freezer.* 269 70.1
A person with allergic sensitivity may have an allergic reaction even in contact with allergenic foods. 279 72.7
“When the nuts are collected from a salad prepared with nuts, the salad product can be consumed by an allergic person.” 280 72.9

According to Table 1.1, it has been determined that there is a lack of knowledge about cross-contact.

Table 1.2. Descriptive Analysis Results on Information Questions on Food Allergens
Most Common Allergens (*) Frequency (%)
Peanut* 267 69.5
Milk* 340 88.5
Strawberry 117 30.5
Soy* 270 70.3
Fruits 125 32.6
Egg* 345 89.8
Sea products* 274 71.4
Gluten* 327 85.2
Chinese Salt - Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) 98 25.5
Sesame* 244 63.5
Nuts* 293 76.3

According to Table 1.2, 70.3 % of the participants gave the correct answer to the allergenicity of soy.

Table 1.3. Descriptive Analysis Results Regarding Research Variables
N Min Max Average SD α
Knowledge level about food allergy 384 .00 25.00 15.91 4.25 .778
Attitude about food allergy 384 1.00 5.00 3.92 .57 .785

The reliability of the questions asked about the level of knowledge and attitude was tested with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. As a result of the analysis, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the knowledge questions was found to be 778, while the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the attitude variable was found to be 785. These values show that the reliability of the questions asked is high (Table 1.3).

Table 1.4. Independent Sample T Test and One-Way Analysis of Variance Results for the Relationship between Demographic Information and Food Allergy Knowledge
Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy N Ort. SS F & t p
Gender 1.762 0.079
Woman 91 16.59 3.61
Boy 293 15.70 4.42
Age 3.912 0.004*
16–19 years old 28 14.11 4.98
20–24 years old 102 15.18 3.97
25–30 years old 104 16.19 4.09
30–39 years old 102 16.98 4.01
40 years and older 48 15.63 4.72
Educational status 6.341 0.000*
Literate, primary or secondary school graduate 101 14.66 4.96
High school graduate 176 15.86 4.10
Associate degree graduate 62 16.95 3.01
Undergraduate or postgraduate graduate 45 17.44 3.87
Mission in the business 8.538 0.000*
Executive 75 17.65 3.47
Kitchen staff 191 15.32 4.65
service personnel 118 15.75 3.74
Working time in the current business 1.647 0.178
less than 1 year 85 15.27 4.11
1–3 years 185 15.88 4.29
4–6 years 59 16.86 3.91
7 years and above 55 15.98 4.62

As a result of the independent sample t-test performed in Table 1.4, it was found that the level of knowledge about food allergy did not differ significantly according to the gender of the participants. t =​ 1.762. p > 0.05. In addition, according to the results of the one-way analysis of variance, it was found that the level of knowledge about food allergy did not differ significantly according to the working time of the participants in the current business. F(0.380) =​ 1.647. p > 0.05.

Table 1.5. Independent Sample T-Test Results Regarding the Relationship between Knowledge of Food Allergy
Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy N Ort. SS t p
Have you received any training on food allergies? 3.858 0.000*
Yes 211 16.65 3.48
No 173 15.00 4.90
Has training on Food Allergy been given in your current business? 2.610 0.009*
Yes 197 16.46 3.59
No 187 15.33 4.80
Have you done personal research on food allergies? 6.686 0.000*
Yes 246 16.94 3.21
No 138 14.07 5.18
Do you think that the actions taken for food allergy in your current business are sufficient? 0.693 0.489
Yes 275 16.00 3.88
No 109 15.67 5.10

According to Table 1.5, the level of knowledge about food allergy is significantly higher among the participants who received training on food allergy according to the labeling regulation, those who received training on food allergy in their workplace, and who conducted personal research on food allergy.

Table 1.6. Independent Sample T-Test Results Regarding the Relationship between Attitudes about Food Allergy
Attitudes about Food Allergy N Ort. SS t P
Have you received any training on food allergies? 3.738 0.000*
Yes 211 4.02 0.56
No 173 3.81 0.57
Has training on food allergy been given in your current business? 2.353 0.019*
Yes 197 3.99 0.56
No 187 3.85 0.58
Have you done personal research on food allergies? 5.176 0.000*
Yes 246 4.03 0.53
No 138 3.73 0.59
Do you think that the actions taken for food allergy in your current business are sufficient? 1.972 0.049*
Yes 275 3.96 0.56
No 109 3.83 0.59

As a result of the independent sample t-test performed in Table 1.6, it was found that all of them differed according to the answers given to the questions about the attitude about food allergy, respectively, t =​ 3.738, 2.353, 5.176, 1.972, p <0.05. Accordingly, it is seen that the attitudes of the participants, who received training on food allergy, were trained in this regard in the business they work, who conducted personal research on food allergy, and who found the actions taken for food allergy in the business they work to be sufficient, were significantly more positive.

Table 1.7. Pearson Correlation Analysis Results Regarding the Relationship between Level of Knowledge about Food Allergy and Attitudes about Food Allergy
Attitude about Food Allergy
Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy N 384
r 0.371
p 0.000

Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationships between Attitudes About Food Allergy and Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy (Table 1.7). As a result of the analysis, a significant and positive correlation was found between the Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy and Attitudes About Food Allergy, r =​ .371, p <0.01. According to this result, it can be said that as the level of knowledge about food allergy increases, the attitude about food allergy increases positively.

When the nuts are collected from a salad prepared with nuts, the salad product can be consumed by an allergic person.” statement is incorrect and 72.9 % of the participants gave the correct answer. In Tatlı (2019)‘s research, 62.4 % of the participants gave wrong answers. Common et al. (2013), on the other hand, it was determined that 13 % of the employees thought that the product would not cause allergies since the allergen product was extracted from a ready-to-eat product. In this regard, it can be said that the level of knowledge of the employees has increased.

Details

Pages
428
Publication Year
2025
ISBN (PDF)
9783631928301
ISBN (ePUB)
9783631928318
ISBN (Softcover)
9783631922040
DOI
10.3726/b22455
Language
English
Publication date
2024 (December)
Keywords
Alternative Tourism Types Covid-19 Cultural Heritage Gastronomy Hotel Management Marketing Recreation Technology in Toursim Tourism Industry Tourism Management Tourist‘s Behaviour
Published
Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien, 2025. 428 pp. 1 fig. col., 8 fig. b/w, 28 tables.
Product Safety
Peter Lang Group AG

Biographical notes

İrfan Yazicioğlu (Volume editor) Özgür Yayla (Volume editor) Alper Işın (Volume editor) Fuat Bayram (Volume editor) Eren Yalçın (Volume editor)

Irfan Yazıcıog˘lu is Professor at Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Faculty of Tourism. His main research interests are tourism management, gastronomy and hotel management. Ozgur Yayla is Associate Professor at the Manavgat Tourism Faculty, Akdeniz University, Turkey. His primary research interests involve recreational activities, service quality, tourist behaviour and destination marketing. Alper Is, ın is Associate Professor at I˙zmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Tourism. His main research interests are tourism management, gastronomy and hotel management. Fuat Bayram is Assistant Professor at Bolu Abant I˙zzet Baysal University, Mengen Vocational School, Department of Hotel, Restaurant and Catering Services. His main research interests are gastronomy and culinary arts and tourism management. Eren Yalcın is a research assistant at Selcuk University, Faculty of Tourism. His main research interests are gastronomy and nutrition.

Previous

Title: Contemporary Studies and Theories in Gastronomy and Food Science