Contemporary Studies and Theories in Gastronomy and Food Science
Summary
Excerpt
Table Of Contents
- Cover
- Title
- Copyright
- About the author
- About the book
- This eBook can be cited
- Table of Contents
- Chapter 1 Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Handlers and Managers Working in Chain Food and Beverage Business in Turkey (Ecem Akay and Ilkay Yilmaz)
- Chapter 2 The Use of Food in Children’s Books: A Review (Fatma Koç)
- Chapter 3 An Organic Transformation Story: Değirmen Farm (Ahu Sezgin)
- Chapter 4 Evaluation of Bursa’s Geographically Indicated Food Products within the Scope of Gastronomy Tourism (Ayhan Dağdeviren and Yusuf Ziya Akbaş)
- Chapter 5 The Emergence of New Culinary Movements (Maksut Özkeşkek)
- Chapter 6 Cultural Heritage in Gastronomy (Zuhal Özdemir Yaman and Büşra Yeşilyurt Sağdiç)
- Chapter 7 Journey to Chocolate (Sena Ekinci and Nevzat Emrah Özçelik)
- Chapter 8 General Characteristics and Historical Processes of Turkish Cuisine (Gökhan Şalli and Sercan Kadam)
- Chapter 9 Phygitalization in Gastronomy (Betül Öztürk, Didem Tiraş, and Karahan Kara)
- Chapter 10 Reintroduction of Sprouts and Microgreens to the Gastronomy World (Erdi Eren and Aybuke Ceyhun Sezgin)
- Chapter 11 Tourist Typology and Memorable Gastronomic Experience (Seda Yilmaz)
- Chapter 12 The Effect of Gastronomy Trends on Accommodation Preferences; Therapeutic Nutrition Tendency in Tourism Behavior (Hilal Kul)
- Chapter 13 Comparison of Turkish-Iranian Dishes in the 15th Century (Nazanin Nikeghbal and Hilmi Rafet Yüncü)
- Chapter 14 Plant-based Menus: A New Trend for Restaurants (Esra Dogu Baykut)
- Chapter 15 Digital Nomads as Culinary Ambassadors (Önder Yayla and Şeyda Yayla)
- Chapter 16 Artificial Meat as a Gastronomic Element (Berrin Güzel and Ilgaz Feray Demirağ)
- Chapter 17 Waste-Free Kitchen Management in Gastronomy (Vedat Kayiş and Atif Akkil)
- Chapter 18 Surimi as a Gastronomic Value: A Scientific Review of Gastronomy, Origin, and Technology (Ali Şen)
- Chapter 19 The Deep Roots of Coffee Culture/A Tasting Journey Around the World (Mustafa Yilmaz)
- Chapter 20 Alternative Protein Sources for Individuals on a Vegan Diet; Meat Analogs (Sibel Ayyildiz and Ayşe Nur Uslu)
- Chapter 21 Geographical Indications and Gastronomic Value Sustainability: Sherbets (Sevil Atalay Tohumcu and Gencay Saatci Savsa)
- Chapter 22 The Meeting Point of Flavors: Gastronomy Festivals (Irfan Yurt)
- Chapter 23 Intangible Cultural Aspects of the Gastronomic Product (Ibrahim Çekiç)
- Chapter 24 The Effects of Tablecloth Selection on Consumer Feelings in Gastronomy (Çağlar Bayar)
- Chapter 25 Storytelling as a Marketing Tool in Gastronomy Tourism (Özge Adan Gök and Ceren Miral Çavdirli)
- Chapter 26 Introduction to Pastry Making: History, Classification, Education, and Pastry Making Practices (Eda Güneş and Doğukan Bayesen)
- Chapter 27 Gastronomy Photography (Mehmet Fatih Kayran)
- Chapter 28 Gastronomy Museum (S. Ceylin Şanli Kayran)
- Chapter 29 Gastronomic Tourism Products within the Scope of Intangible Cultural Heritage (Çağri Sürücü)
- Chapter 30 Taste and Flavor Perception (Elif Zeynep Özer and Alper Çevik)
- Chapter 31 The Role of Mass Nutrition Systems in Food Allergen Management (Emel Kaynakci and Irem Serra Pekşen)
- Chapter 32 Evaluation of Gastronomic Elements of Railway Travel Routes in Turkey (Ayşen Ertaş Sabanci and Ekin Akbulut)
- Chapter 33 Sensory Analysis and Consumer Perception in Gastronomy (Sena Bakir and Ayşe Gülnihal Altin)
- Chapter 34 Evaluation of Viticulture in Northern Cyprus in Terms of Gastronomy Tourism (Soner Özyalçin and Mete Ünal Girgen)
- Chapter 35 A Qualitative Study on the Implementation of the Cross-age Peer Tutoring Model in Culinary Lessons (Beysun Güneri and V. Rüya Ehtiyar)
Chapter 1 Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Handlers and Managers Working in Chain Food and Beverage Business in Turkey
Introduction
With the changing life conditions and developing technology, especially women’s being more active in business life and the fact that eating is now a form of communication causes the rapid increase in mass consumption places and the fact that businesses producing food products become chains and serve in different locations day by day. Chain businesses are advantageous in that they are managed from a single center and that all products produced are structured over standard recipes. Standardization is very important as chain businesses are businesses that can be in different cities and locations, as well as outside the country.
This study aims to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the employees in these businesses in Istanbul, which is the headquarters of most chain food and beverage companies in Turkey, about allergenic foods that are required to be notified. In addition, how food allergy management is carried out is to examine the actions taken by the business.
Material and Methods Research Design and Participants
In the quantitative part of this research, the sample is; It consists of 384 people working in chain food and beverage businesses affiliated with the center of Istanbul. Istanbul is the most populated city in Turkey. In this context, a questionnaire was applied to kitchen chefs and kitchen staff, service department staff, and branch managers working in chain businesses. Ethical permission was obtained from Ayvansaray University Ethics Committee, numbered E-31675095-100-2100001336, for the research conducted between June and October 2020.
This study was designed as mixed-method research. The process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative data together to understand the research problem in research or a series of research is expressed as a mixed-method (Cresswell & Clark, 2011).
In the quantitative part of the study, the descriptive survey method was used, which aims to show a situation as it is without trying to influence it (Büyüköztürk et al., 2016). It was aimed to determine the knowledge level of the participants on current food safety and hygiene through the descriptive survey method. A descriptive survey is a qualitative approach in which the researcher presents a situation description by collecting detailed and comprehensive information about one or more situations (Cresswell, 2016).
Data Analysis
In the analysis of quantitative data, descriptive statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V.21 (IBM, IL, USA) and the arithmetic mean standard deviation, and percentages (%) of the obtained data were calculated (Büyüköztürk, 2016). For knowledge questions, the percentage of correct answers given to each knowledge question is given. Attitude questions, on the other hand, were converted into a score that determines the attitudes of the participants, since there is no right or wrong answer for each item since it is subjective. By taking the average of the answers given to each item, a general level of attitude about that participant’s food allergy was determined. Similarly, the person’s knowledge level was expressed with a single variable by giving 1 point to each person’s correct answers and 0 points to their incorrect answers, and adding these points. The mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values of these “knowledge” and “attitude” scores are given. In addition, the Cronbach’s Alpha values of these variables, that is, the reliability coefficients, are stated. Participants’ gender, age, educational background, etc. The independent sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance tested whether all other demographic data differed according to the knowledge and attitude levels of the participants. The pairwise comparison of the groups with the findings that were significant in ANOVA was made with the Scheffe test, known as the post-hoc test. After the comparison analysis, the relationship between knowledge and attitude levels was tested with correlation analysis. Findings with a p-value <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Analysis of Quantitative Data
Items (T) True, (F) False | Frequency(n) | (%) |
---|---|---|
A food allergy is an abnormal response of the immune system to ordinarily harmless food or an ingredient in a food. | 297 | 77.3 |
Lactose into Lactose and milk and dairy products are the same concept.* | 101 | 26.3 |
Food allergy is caused by the proteins found in foods. | 165 | 43.0 |
Food Allergy is a reaction after the food is digested in the body. | 62 | 16.1 |
Food Allergy can even result in death, depending on the sensitivity of the person. | 340 | 88.5 |
According to the Turkish Food Codex Labeling regulation, the ingredients that cause allergies are shown on the food packaging labels. | 316 | 82.3 |
According to the Turkish Food Codex Labeling regulation, allergen components are shown on the menus. | 294 | 76.6 |
As a result of cooking processes performed at high temperatures (deep frying, oven frying, etc.), allergens in the food are destroyed.* | 261 | 68.0 |
If a person with an allergic reaction consumes large amounts of cold water, the existing reaction will be alleviated.* | 157 | 40.9 |
When preparing meals with products containing allergens, different tools and equipment should be used. | 319 | 83.1 |
While preparing a food allergy-safe meal, other non-allergenic foods may be touched with the same glove.* | 269 | 70.1 |
Factors in allergenic foods can be destroyed if the products are cooked at high temperatures or stored in the freezer.* | 269 | 70.1 |
A person with allergic sensitivity may have an allergic reaction even in contact with allergenic foods. | 279 | 72.7 |
“When the nuts are collected from a salad prepared with nuts, the salad product can be consumed by an allergic person.” | 280 | 72.9 |
According to Table 1.1, it has been determined that there is a lack of knowledge about cross-contact.
Most Common Allergens (*) | Frequency | (%) |
---|---|---|
Peanut* | 267 | 69.5 |
Milk* | 340 | 88.5 |
Strawberry | 117 | 30.5 |
Soy* | 270 | 70.3 |
Fruits | 125 | 32.6 |
Egg* | 345 | 89.8 |
Sea products* | 274 | 71.4 |
Gluten* | 327 | 85.2 |
Chinese Salt - Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) | 98 | 25.5 |
Sesame* | 244 | 63.5 |
Nuts* | 293 | 76.3 |
According to Table 1.2, 70.3 % of the participants gave the correct answer to the allergenicity of soy.
N | Min | Max | Average | SD | α | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge level about food allergy | 384 | .00 | 25.00 | 15.91 | 4.25 | .778 |
Attitude about food allergy | 384 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.92 | .57 | .785 |
The reliability of the questions asked about the level of knowledge and attitude was tested with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. As a result of the analysis, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the knowledge questions was found to be 778, while the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the attitude variable was found to be 785. These values show that the reliability of the questions asked is high (Table 1.3).
Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy | N | Ort. | SS | F & t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | 1.762 | 0.079 | |||
Woman | 91 | 16.59 | 3.61 | ||
Boy | 293 | 15.70 | 4.42 | ||
Age | 3.912 | 0.004* | |||
16–19 years old | 28 | 14.11 | 4.98 | ||
20–24 years old | 102 | 15.18 | 3.97 | ||
25–30 years old | 104 | 16.19 | 4.09 | ||
30–39 years old | 102 | 16.98 | 4.01 | ||
40 years and older | 48 | 15.63 | 4.72 | ||
Educational status | 6.341 | 0.000* | |||
Literate, primary or secondary school graduate | 101 | 14.66 | 4.96 | ||
High school graduate | 176 | 15.86 | 4.10 | ||
Associate degree graduate | 62 | 16.95 | 3.01 | ||
Undergraduate or postgraduate graduate | 45 | 17.44 | 3.87 | ||
Mission in the business | 8.538 | 0.000* | |||
Executive | 75 | 17.65 | 3.47 | ||
Kitchen staff | 191 | 15.32 | 4.65 | ||
service personnel | 118 | 15.75 | 3.74 | ||
Working time in the current business | 1.647 | 0.178 | |||
less than 1 year | 85 | 15.27 | 4.11 | ||
1–3 years | 185 | 15.88 | 4.29 | ||
4–6 years | 59 | 16.86 | 3.91 | ||
7 years and above | 55 | 15.98 | 4.62 |
As a result of the independent sample t-test performed in Table 1.4, it was found that the level of knowledge about food allergy did not differ significantly according to the gender of the participants. t = 1.762. p > 0.05. In addition, according to the results of the one-way analysis of variance, it was found that the level of knowledge about food allergy did not differ significantly according to the working time of the participants in the current business. F(0.380) = 1.647. p > 0.05.
Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy | N | Ort. | SS | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Have you received any training on food allergies? | 3.858 | 0.000* | |||
Yes | 211 | 16.65 | 3.48 | ||
No | 173 | 15.00 | 4.90 | ||
Has training on Food Allergy been given in your current business? | 2.610 | 0.009* | |||
Yes | 197 | 16.46 | 3.59 | ||
No | 187 | 15.33 | 4.80 | ||
Have you done personal research on food allergies? | 6.686 | 0.000* | |||
Yes | 246 | 16.94 | 3.21 | ||
No | 138 | 14.07 | 5.18 | ||
Do you think that the actions taken for food allergy in your current business are sufficient? | 0.693 | 0.489 | |||
Yes | 275 | 16.00 | 3.88 | ||
No | 109 | 15.67 | 5.10 |
According to Table 1.5, the level of knowledge about food allergy is significantly higher among the participants who received training on food allergy according to the labeling regulation, those who received training on food allergy in their workplace, and who conducted personal research on food allergy.
Attitudes about Food Allergy | N | Ort. | SS | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Have you received any training on food allergies? | 3.738 | 0.000* | |||
Yes | 211 | 4.02 | 0.56 | ||
No | 173 | 3.81 | 0.57 | ||
Has training on food allergy been given in your current business? | 2.353 | 0.019* | |||
Yes | 197 | 3.99 | 0.56 | ||
No | 187 | 3.85 | 0.58 | ||
Have you done personal research on food allergies? | 5.176 | 0.000* | |||
Yes | 246 | 4.03 | 0.53 | ||
No | 138 | 3.73 | 0.59 | ||
Do you think that the actions taken for food allergy in your current business are sufficient? | 1.972 | 0.049* | |||
Yes | 275 | 3.96 | 0.56 | ||
No | 109 | 3.83 | 0.59 |
As a result of the independent sample t-test performed in Table 1.6, it was found that all of them differed according to the answers given to the questions about the attitude about food allergy, respectively, t = 3.738, 2.353, 5.176, 1.972, p <0.05. Accordingly, it is seen that the attitudes of the participants, who received training on food allergy, were trained in this regard in the business they work, who conducted personal research on food allergy, and who found the actions taken for food allergy in the business they work to be sufficient, were significantly more positive.
Attitude about Food Allergy | ||
---|---|---|
Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy | N | 384 |
r | 0.371 | |
p | 0.000 | |
Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationships between Attitudes About Food Allergy and Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy (Table 1.7). As a result of the analysis, a significant and positive correlation was found between the Level of Knowledge About Food Allergy and Attitudes About Food Allergy, r = .371, p <0.01. According to this result, it can be said that as the level of knowledge about food allergy increases, the attitude about food allergy increases positively.
When the nuts are collected from a salad prepared with nuts, the salad product can be consumed by an allergic person.” statement is incorrect and 72.9 % of the participants gave the correct answer. In Tatlı (2019)‘s research, 62.4 % of the participants gave wrong answers. Common et al. (2013), on the other hand, it was determined that 13 % of the employees thought that the product would not cause allergies since the allergen product was extracted from a ready-to-eat product. In this regard, it can be said that the level of knowledge of the employees has increased.
Details
- Pages
- 428
- Publication Year
- 2025
- ISBN (PDF)
- 9783631928301
- ISBN (ePUB)
- 9783631928318
- ISBN (Softcover)
- 9783631922040
- DOI
- 10.3726/b22455
- Language
- English
- Publication date
- 2024 (December)
- Keywords
- Alternative Tourism Types Covid-19 Cultural Heritage Gastronomy Hotel Management Marketing Recreation Technology in Toursim Tourism Industry Tourism Management Tourist‘s Behaviour
- Published
- Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien, 2025. 428 pp. 1 fig. col., 8 fig. b/w, 28 tables.
- Product Safety
- Peter Lang Group AG