Music Festivals as Community Learning and Development
Guattari and Deleuze have provided a radical framework to theorize capitalism and aesthetics. It is no longer enough to think about the production of aesthetics and its impact on a unitary subject. They have shown that an analysis of the production of subjectivity within capitalism requires that we engage in a double analysis, that of social subjection (artist, folk singer, doctor, economist, entrepreneur, cultural worker) and machinic enslavement (folk, people, market, Hiphop Kulture, population, data set). Analysis of social subjectivity requires critical engagement with the types of subjects available for us and with which we construct (often temporary) individual identities. Their radical contribution, machinic enslavement, asks that we engage in another double analysis, of the pre-personal (pre-cognitive and pre-verbal) and the supra-personal (economic, political, aesthetic systems). Informed by these two sets of forces, linguistic and aesthetic signification is produced through the exchange of resources (paint, words, sounds, gestures, visualizations, currency) from which emerge individual and social formations. Capitalism captures these pre-personal and supra-personal forces for the task of production. You do not just work in a factory; you are a worker. You don’t just make hip-hop; you are a hiphoppa. In this way, the subject-body is put to work completely (body, identity, subject, subjectivity). Add to this the political, ← 139 | 140 → educational, juridical, and legal supra-systems that work to ensure the production of the proper subjectivity for the continuation of a functioning capitalist system. This provides a system view of critical constructivism and insight into discourse on social...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.