Enhancing Teacher Metacognitive Learning to Improve Student Academic Performance
Part II. Four Core Practices of Concept Mapping
the practices of concept mapping The focus of this part of the book is on how to construct, analyze, and revise concept maps to leverage their power as a tool for instructional planning and metacognitive learning. The upcoming chapters (4 through 7) are intended to provide support while teachers draft and revise a concept map as part of their instructional planning on a particular topic. In each of these chapters, we explain how to create and evaluate concepts maps based on the findings from the research that we described in chapter 2 and other research on con- cept mapping. The practices presented in the chapters also provide a useful guide for teacher educators who want to instruct teacher candidates in how to construct concept maps as part of their instructional planning. These practices center on four key features of concept maps (the big ideas, the linking phrases, the conceptual structures, and the coherence of the map) and are applicable regardless of the subject area being mapped. Chapter 4 focuses on the practice of framing the focus question and selecting the big ideas that will guide the rest of the mapping process. Chapter 5 focuses on the practice of articulating the linking phrases that will connect the concepts in the map. The latter two chapters in this part of the book (6 and 7) focus on the respective practices of organizing the conceptual structure and creating coherence among clusters in the map. We have found that careful attention to 70 using...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.