Edited By Joseph L. DeVitis
The editor has specifically selected key books on social and educational controversies that speak to wide audiences. They frame contextual issues that so-called «school reformers» have often neglected – much to the detriment of any real educational progress. Ultimately, this text is meant to stir our consciences, to disorder our certainties, and to compel us to treat education and culture with both reason and passion. It is highly relevant for courses in social foundations of education, school reform, educational policy studies, philosophy of education, history of education, politics of education, curriculum studies, and teacher education.
Chapter Seventeen: E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know (1987)
← 172 | 173 →
E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know (1987)
Emily Nemeth and Karen Graves
“Of course it’s cultural imperialism. Cultural imperialism has gotten a bad rap.” That’s how a seminar participant recalls hearing E.D. Hirsch, Jr., defend his argument at the core of Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know a few years after the book was published.1 In 1987 the celebrated Professor of English at the University of Virginia had weighed in on the national concern regarding illiteracy. He posited that cultural literacy—the “traditional literate knowledge, the information, attitudes, and assumptions that literate Americans share”—was the only sure remedy for interrupting and disrupting the relationship between illiteracy and poverty.2 It was a bold claim, with clear ramifications for public schools. Hirsch traced a decline in literacy to a favorite punching bag in American politics: colleges of education. Condensing the diverse mix of philosophies and curricula that characterized teacher preparation programs into a pappy concoction of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Dewey, and operating on the assumption that whatever is taught in college finds its way directly to school practice, Hirsch claimed that teachers’ emphasis on the processes of learning had displaced content knowledge in the nation’s schools. His analysis of the literacy problem relied on a transmission model of schooling, one that holds that the school’s primary purpose is to introduce students to a shared culture that enables...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.