From Philosophy to Practice
Chapter 11. Conclusion – Firsts and Lasts
← 194 | 195 →
CONCLUSION – FIRSTS AND LASTS
If there can be no last word in philosophical hermeneutics, there can be no first. The question is how and where to join a continuing “conversation.” (Davey, 2006, p. xi)
We have joined an old, yet current and continuing conversation in a particular way, offering our interpretation of the historical philosophical tradition’s influence on hermeneutics as a research method in applied disciplines. In this book, we have traced the German school of hermeneutic scholars leading to the work of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. From that standpoint, we examined the methodological dilemmas of proceeding with research in way that is consistent with the philosophy that guides it. We followed with an exploration of aspects of hermeneutic research including the address of the topic, the conduct of interviews, interpretation (data analysis) in hermeneutics, examples of interpretive writing of research findings, rigor and integrity of this kind of research, and ending with the call to be accountable to the research in terms of its utility and usefulness.
In this endeavor, we hope we have challenged the notion that hermeneutic research is an unguided research approach, and shown rather that it is a ← 195 | 196 → rigorous practice of attentiveness, openness, discernment, tact, discipline, and dis-position.
…hermeneutics does not constitute a “philosophical position” but a philosophical dis-position. It is a practice of disposing or orientating oneself toward the other and the different with the consequence of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.