Edited By Leah A. Lievrouw
The chapters in this collection, chosen from among the top papers presented in London, suggest that the challenges themselves are constantly being reinvented, broken down and reorganized. The communication discipline undergoes continuous change rather than following an orderly, stepwise path toward the neat, complete accumulation of knowledge. The chapters challenge familiar approaches, notions or assumptions in communication research and scholarship and reflect on the field’s multifaceted and increasingly open character in an era of shifting social relations, formations and technologies.
Chapter Seven: Representation Matters(?): When, How and If Representation Matters to Marginalized Game Audiences
| 107 →
When, How, and If Representation Matters to Marginalized Game Audiences
Why does representation matter? I begin many a class discussion on media diversity with that question. Most of my students give answers that imply some sort of media effect: “bad” representation, representation that casts a group in a negative light or makes people biased toward marginalized groups. “Good” representation, that which helps normalize marginalized groups, provides evidence for equality. Students working in areas of media production argue that it is important to represent groups well so that they will watch/listen/read/play/buy a product. Occasionally, someone will also say that representation matters so that children can grow up and have positive self-images, something that can only happen if they see “good” media representation of people like them. In nearly all cases, my students only talk about these effects in terms of other people, rarely connecting it to their own media consumption practices or experiences unless directly prompted.
My students’ responses jibe well with the long history of research on media representation. Jessica Davis and Oscar Gandy (1999) assert, “Media representations play an important role in informing the ways in which we understand social, cultural, ethnic, and racial differences” (p. 367). Julie D’Acci (2004) demonstrates the ways that “television representations of gender … have very profound effects on very real human bodies, societies, and economics” (p. 376). Film scholar Richard Dyer (2002) argues...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.