A Social Psychological Perspective
Chapter 8. Maintaining Social Hierarchies
← 104 | 105 → ·8·
Group-based oppression is pervasive. In most societies, there are social groups that have more access to power, status, and material well-being and other groups that experience stigma and hardship (Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994; Pratto et al., 1997). In other words, there are dominant and oppressed groups. An example that easily comes to mind is the former apartheid system in South Africa. Similarly, if Blacks are disadvantaged as compared to Whites in the United States, and foreigners are discriminated against in Germany, the same mechanisms are at work. With regard to gender, all societies in the world are unequal (see numbers provided in the Introduction). Most people value equality and justice, which are also embedded in Western countries’ constitutions and laws. Given striking examples of injustice, one could imagine an uproar or even a revolution—or at least the implementation of immediate and strong interventions against such inequalities. Isn’t it strange that this does not happen?
To explain how hierarchical societies are maintained through social and psychological processes, social dominance theory was developed (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). As the theory states, if there are widely accepted ideologies within societies that legitimize discrimination, intergroup conflict is minimized and intergroup relations are smooth (Pratto et al., 1994). Moral and ← 105 | 106 → intellectual justifications for inequalities in power, status, and privilege among groups in a given social system serve to stabilize that system (Sidanius et al., 1994). For example, if there is consensus in a...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.