A Corpus-Based Approach
3. Materials and data 65
65 3. Materials and data 3.1. Disciplinary fields A total of ten academic domains, representing a broad spectrum of scientific enquiry in international English-medium scholarship, were included in the corpus assembled for this study. As argued in the previous chapter, the subdivision of scholarship into separate fields is in many ways an approximation because of the increasing specialisation and interdisciplinarity of contemporary research, with branches of knowledge that did not even exist until a short time ago (e.g. nanotechnology) now at the forefront of research. Even the basic distinction between sciences and humanities, or theoretical and applied disciplines, is not as clear-cut as might be thought. In biological parlance, disciplines are more akin to genera than species, insofar as they imply a conflation of subdisciplines that may eventually aspire to recognition as separate domains, with considerable implications in terms of status, visibility and allocation of resources and facilities. Bearing in mind these limitations, I selected for the corpus a range of disciplines representative of five scientific groupings, whose nature can be briefly described as follows: The natural sciences deal primarily with the detailed descrip- tion of phenomena occurring in the natural world that may also be relevant also to the applied sciences and technologies. The two domains from this category are BIOLOGY and PHYSICS, which in Becher and Trowler’s (2001) classification (cf. Chapter 2, Table 1) would belong to the ‘pure sciences’ group, where they are defined as hard-pure disciplines. The applied sciences deal primarily with the manipulation of reality,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.