A Corpus-Based Approach
10. Conclusions 231
231 10. Conclusions 10.1. Theoretical insights The results of this study shed some light on a small but highly prominent group of variables embedded in the discourse of research, whose presence shows how authors flag fundamental aspects of knowledge linked to the value system shared by the members of a given disciplinary community. The phenomenon is consistent with Reed’s (1996) interpretation of values as ‘regulatory mechanisms’ that mediate between the self and its social environment, reflecting an individual’s stage of socialisation as well as his/her personal growth. The lexical evidence yielded by the RA corpus assembled here suggests that by simply mentioning such variables, an author: recognises their role as basic evaluative parameters applicable to the discipline and its judgements; claims the presence of an axiological common ground among researchers in the discipline despite their different approaches and orientations; signals potential tensions in the research process, that is aspects whose interpretation is controversial and thus negotiable. Though often mentioned in the literature on academic discourse, few applied linguists have attempted to define the notion of ‘value’ and, what is more, its analytical implications remain largely unexplored. Among EAP specialists there is, however, a general recognition that academic literacy includes an awareness of the values that orientate research. Paltridge, for example, argues that learning to write in the academy is “learning to acquire a repertoire of linguistic practices which are based on complex sets of discourses, identities, and values” (2004: 90). Hyland warns that analysts should not underestimate the variability and...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.