Edited By Vijay K. Bhatia, Christopher N. Candlin and Maurizio Gotti
VIJAY K. BHATIA / CHRISTOPHER N. CANDLIN / MAURIZIO GOTTI Introduction 7
VIJAY K. BHATIA / CHRISTOPHER N. CANDLIN / MAURIZIO GOTTI Introduction 1. The discourses of dispute resolution Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to all forms of dispute resolution mechanisms, either assisted by specialists in ADR or direct- ly negotiated among the disputing parties, which fall outside of the jurisdictionally regulated process popularly known as litigation. Some of the major forms of ADR include conciliation, mediation and arbi- tration. The parties at dispute may initially attempt to resolve the matter themselves, if they feel that the dispute is not too polarized, and where there exists some measure of trust and goodwill among the disputing parties. In such circumstances, the parties often try to arrive at direct conciliation with or without the help of a neutral internal or external facilitator. Conciliation thus primarily involves developing a suitable framework to encourage openness and a positive understanding be- tween the parties at dispute. The job of a neutral conciliator is to faci- litate such an understanding as a basis for the resolution of the dispute, by helping the parties to set up communicative channels, by means of these to clarify some of the main misunderstandings or issues, and to develop mutual trust among the parties. Conciliation may also be used in conjunction with other methods of ADR, particularly mediation. If conciliation fails to create an adequate environment of mutual trust and understanding, the parties may wish to explore other options of ADR, such as mediation, instead of going to the courts for litigation. Mediation,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.