The research questions justifying the ethnographic case studies detailed in this book are: What kind of cognitive frames and communicative strategies do Western experts activate in order to convey their culturally-marked knowledge of specialized discourse – by using their ELF varieties – to non-Westerners with different linguistic and socio-cultural backgrounds? What kind of power asymmetries can be identified when non-Westerners try to communicate their own knowledge by using their respective ELF varieties? Is it possible to ultimately develop a mode of ELF specialized communication that can be shared by both Western experts and non-Western migrants?
Part Two: Conversation Analysis of Immigration-advice Encounters 119
Part Two: Conversation Analysis of Immigration-advice Encounters 121 V. Schema Conflicts in ELF-mediated Legal Interactions 1. Introduction: the role of schema divergences in cross-cultural miscommunication This chapter presents a study in cognitive sociolinguistics concerned with an application of Schema Theory to cases of intercultural and interlingual miscommunication occurred in Italian situations of ‘legal advice’ to African economic migrants and asylum seekers. In such situations, the professional interactions were carried out through the use of lingua-franca English (ELF). The focus of this study is specifi- cally to investigate the cognitive processes and pragmatic strategies by which Italian legal advisors try to convey to their African clients not only their culturally-marked knowledge of the law, but also the con- ceptual procedures by which they come to apply it. This seems to occur by means of particular pragmalinguistic routines that, though actualized through the use of ELF, are here assumed to originate from the advisors’ own legal-discourse experience developed within West- ern – in this case, Italian – specialized contexts. The assumption is that, precisely because the knowledge and applications of the law which the advisors rely on are the products of a Western legal tradition, they are often unavailable to the immigrants’ conceptualizations and actualiza- tions of their own legal systems. This can thus explain the difficulty that they often meet in accessing legal concepts that are alien to their own native cultures. To investigate such cognitive difficulties that eventually hinder the successful development of cross-cultural legal interactions through ELF, this chapter advances a...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.