The Dangerous Art of Biography
Chapter Seven: ‘I Know Just How You Feel’: The Ethics of Epistemology in Biography 133
Chapter Seven: ‘I Know Just How You Feel’: The Ethics of Epistemology in Biography Sartre versus Levinas The philosopher David Jopling begins an exploration of the ethics of epistemology in biography by contrasting the views of Sartre and Levinas. For Sartre, as Jopling makes clear, total transparency, total knowledge of another was an ideal to be striven for. Jopling quotes comments from Sartre about his life with de Beauvoir: ‘Life as part of a couple made me hard and transparent like a diamond […] I had the impression, at every instant, that my friends were reading my innermost self; that they could see my thoughts forming […] and that what was becoming clear to me was already clear to them. I could feel their gaze to my very entrails.’1 Later, Sartre wrote that ‘I think transparency should always be substituted for secrecy […] A man’s existence must be entirely visible to his neighbour, whose own existence must be entirely visible in turn, before true social harmony can be established.’2 Jopling comments that Sartre did make, in his writings, a connection between totalising knowledge and violence,3 but that Sartre nonetheless saw total honesty as something which should be aimed for, a kind of austere ideal of existential authenticity.4 Jopling points out, however, that Sartre’s own biographical practice throws his ideal of total knowledge into question. Jopling notes that at the end of Sartre’s biography of Jean Genet, ‘Sartre asks rhetorically: “Have I been fair enough to Genet? I think I have defended Genet...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.