Show Less

Bonhoeffer and Interpretive Theory

Essays on Methods and Understanding

Series:

Peter Frick

How does the contemporary reader make sense of the life and writings of such an icon as Dietrich Bonhoeffer? The essays in this volume seek to address this question by carefully examining the social, cultural, religious and intellectual locations that inform the Sitz im Leben of a vast readership of Bonhoeffer. The focus of each of the essays is thus on the task of articulating and clarifying a hermeneutically self-conscious and responsible approach to interpreting and understanding Bonhoeffer. The authors come from widely divergent backgrounds, both geographically and intellectually, and therefore offer a wide spectrum of dialogue. Methods and approaches examined in the essays discuss themes such as gender, religion, race, ecology, politics, philosophy, literature among others.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Markus Franz: Inside and Beyond the “Bonhoeffer-Archive”– Foucaultian Reflections on the Discourse of Bonhoeffer’s Life and Theology

Extract

Markus Franz Inside and Beyond the “Bonhoeffer-Archive” – Foucaultian Reflections on the Discourse of Bonhoeffer’s Life and Theology “Anyone who has read Eberhard Bethge’s Dietrich Bonhoeffer: A Biography,” writes Stanley Hauerwas, “knows it is impossible to distinguish between Bonhoeffer’s life and work.”1 Considering the unbroken popularity and importance of “Bonhoeffer,” it is hard to discern which pole – Bonhoeffer’s extraordinary life-story or his radical, yet fragmented theology – is more in- fluential on the so called “Bonhoeffer phenomenon,”2 which we are part of. However one may account for this phenomenon, the close connection and mutual influence between Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s life and his theological writings also contain a series of crucial questions for Bonhoeffer research. Given the variety of epistemological presuppositions, the intrinsic meth- odological difficulty of approaching both “life” and “work” adequately constitutes a persistent challenge. On the one hand, historical research ap- proaches “Bonhoeffer” with a specific historical paradigm by trying to shed more light on the social and political circumstances of his life or by show- ing developments in his thoughts. On the other hand, it seems that many theological or philosophical approaches try to yield results that go beyond a historical analysis of Bonhoeffer’s work by synthesizing and systematizing Bonhoeffer’s theological and ethical deliberations. Accordingly many ap- proaches are giving primacy to either the “life” or the “work” of Bonhoeffer and thus create at the least a “methodological slope” and in the worst cases partial or strongly biased readings.3 1 Stanley Hauerwas, Performing the Faith....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.