A Critical Evaluation of the Legal Treatment of Private Use under Chinese Digital Copyright Law
Chapter III Pros and Cons: Debates on Employing TPMs to Control Private Use in the Digital Environment
Digital technology and Internet networks have led to a “digital dilemma”. On the one hand, they have greatly facilitated the transmission of information and enriched end users’ enjoyment. On the other hand, however, they have diminished the control of right holders over their copyrighted works.427 Given the fact that the abolishment of the private use limitation in the Chinese digital copyright framework as an anti-piracy measure is not a sound choice, in this chapter, I intend to explore the right place for private use in the digital copyright regime. I will start with the boundary between copyright exploitation and private use enjoyment. Then I will discuss the efforts to harmonize TPMs and private use from both the legislative and judicial perspectives, as well as the tit-for-tat debates on employing TPMs to control private use. Finally, I will employ the objective of the Chinese copyright law to evaluate the TPMs control and private use. 3.1 Locating the Boundary between Exploitation and Enjoyment As mentioned above, private use is the use of works by individual users for their own study, research, or self-entertainment purposes, such as reading a book, singing a song, and watching a movie on television. On account of its being limited to the enjoyment of works and not their exploitation, private use has traditionally been outside of the scope of copyright. Private use is, however, notoriously uncertain both in theory and in application. Given the fact that the copying itself, be it in a private use context or a...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.