Comparative Analysis of the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman for England and Wales and the Justizvollzugsbeauftragter des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
This chapter provides a compilation of the study’s results and highlights their impact on praxis and research. A critical analysis of the research constraints will be conducted. A description of future prospects in this field rounds this study off. I. Compilation and potential impact of research results Any compilation of research results has to answer the question: what – if any- thing – was learned? This researcher set out to challenge the assumption of insti- tutional success at the heart of the prison ombudsman spread. To this end the structures, forms, and means of proliferation and implementation of prison om- budsmen were examined with the intent to provide comprehensive insights from which to develop a primary academic understanding of prison ombudsmen. Dur- ing the examination of two selected examples, two alternate but comparable “perceptions of the world and justice” with their individual approaches to “solv- ing practical problems by accommodating competing interests as well as meet- ing the prerequisites of substantive justice” were discovered.956 This was achieved using the method of grounded theory. The pursuit of any interesting leads, as demanded by this methodology, motivated this researcher to examine prison ombudsmen in the context of the development of the ombuds- man concept. A comparable synopsis explicating the demand, structures and op- erational modes has so far not been available at a comparable level of detail, de- gree of systematization or with as general an applicability to all prison ombuds- men. Equally innovative is the attempt of presenting an exhaustive list of all...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.