Show Less

Introduction to the Study of the History of Epistemology

Series:

VEDA

The text is structured in chronological and ideological order and presents nine basic types of the classical perception of the problem of knowledge through an analysis of the atomistic theory of perception, Platonism, Aristotle’s doctrine, scepticism, rationalism, sensualism, Kant’s theory, phenomenological-existential, pragmatic, and (post) analytical perceptions. The proposed work aspires to be an introduction (not a complete presentation, neither in the number of types, nor in a full interpretation) and a basis for the reader’s interpretations which is reflected in the structure of the text.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Democritus and the Causal Theory of Knowledge

Extract

27 Democritus and the Causal Theory of Knowledge   Keywords: perception, effl uence, qualities, eff ect   According to several epistemologists, the history of epistemology begins with Parmenides’s diff erentiation between the way of seeming and the way of truth, and with Zeno’s arguments in favour of Parmenides. How- ever, one of the historically oldest and ideologically most basic approaches to the explanation of knowledge is the causal-mechanistic theory, the roots of which can be found in Democritus. Democritus believed that knowledge could be ex - plained by the eff ect of objects on our receptors (67 A 1). With some exceptions (touch), they do not aff ect us directly (they do not enter us alone). Instead, he assumed that they aff ect us via tiny material particles (effl uences, images) which he assumed are released from the surfaces of things and enter our receptors. All perceivable proper- 28 ties of things are products of detaching (the “outfl ow” of images from perceived objects) and an affi liation of atoms – their connection with the atoms of receptors (68 A 49). The essence of the perceived phenomenon is not inherent to the thing or the receptor, but it is some- where between them – in the nature of presenting the effl uences of things (68 A  135). The structure of effl u- ences – images – is materially (atomically) and formally dependent on the shape and surface of objects. Democritus was a  realist. He assumed that our per- ception (ἡ αἰσθήσις) is the cause of the eff ect...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.