Jan Greisch talks about today as a hermeneutic age of reason (Comp.: Rozumět a interpretovat. Praha: FÚ AV ČR, 1995). What does he mean by that? What once seemed to be provincial and marginal, acquired in philosophical hermeneutics of the 19th century a form of analysis of transcendental conditions of possibility of understanding and today it is a matter of course to accept the interpretativeness of the thinking itself. Peter Szondi points out that hermeneutics must not be reconciled with being only a strange application of a general theory. Philosophical hermeneutics deals with “dialectics” of uniqueness and universality. We live in a period that invented the universality of the problem of understanding and interpretation and is trying to define measuredly the form of understanding of the reason itself. Otto Pöggler calls it hermeneutic philosophy. Without exaggeration we can ← 7 | 8 → say about the whole of philosophy that it needs to be hermeneutic.
We believe that this exciting journey, which stretches across philosophy in history from instrumental understanding of hermeneutics as a methodological reference tool connected with the understanding of texts through development stages up to the acknowledgment of hermeneutics as a fundamental characteristic of philosophical thinking in general, cannot be left aside if we do not want to inflict injury to a reader studying the basics of humanist culture. ← 8 | 9 →
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.