Show Less
Restricted access

Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language


Martin Hinton

This volume is concerned with issues in experimental philosophy and experimental linguistics. Examining experiments in language from a variety of perspectives, it asks what form they should take and what should count as evidence. There is particular focus on the status of linguistic intuitions and the use of language corpora. A number of papers address issues of methodology in experimental work, while other contributions examine the use of thought experiments and what the hypothetical can tell us about the actual. The aim of this collection is to bring together the work of linguists and philosophers in order that they may learn from one another, and to help both groups understand how the use of experimental methods can affect the arguments they employ and the claims they make.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Roland Bluhm - Corpus Analysis in Philosophy


| 91 →

Roland Bluhm

Corpus Analysis in Philosophy

1. Introduction

The aim of this paper is to discuss the potential benefit of corpus analysis, a (partly) empirical method from linguistics, for philosophy. ‘Corpus analysis’ is not only the name of the method, but also a rough description of it, because the method consists in analysing data taken from linguistic text corpora. In linguistics, using such text corpora is an established practice. A fair number of them are nowadays freely accessible on the internet, and using them has become relatively easy, even for researchers without linguistic expertise. Surprisingly, corpus analysis has been widely disregarded by philosophers, including those that profess a methodical interest in language—a state of affairs that I believe ought to change.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.