Show Less
Restricted access

Pragmantax II

Zum aktuellen Stand der Linguistik und ihrer Teildisziplinen- Akten des 43. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Magdeburg 2008- The Present State of Linguistics and its Sub-Disciplines- Proceedings of the 43 rd Linguistics Colloquium, Magdeburg

Series:

Edited By Katrin Schöpe, Renate Belentschikow, Angelika Bergien and Armin Burkhardt

Dieser Band vereinigt 63 Beiträge in deutscher, englischer und französischer Sprache. Er repräsentiert ein breites Spektrum an Themen und Erkenntnissen aus verschiedenen Bereichen der Linguistik und versucht damit eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme des Faches. Die Beiträge widmen sich Fragestellungen aus den Gebieten der Grammatik, Semantik, Text- und Diskurspragmatik sowie der Angewandten Linguistik. Aufsätze zur kontrastiven Linguistik und zur Fremdsprachendidaktik runden den Band ab.
This volume contains the revised versions of 63 papers, written in German, English and French. It considers a broad spectrum of topics and findings from various areas of linguistics and thereby offers a critical review of the field. The authors address questions ranging from grammar, semantics, text and discourse pragmatics to issues from the field of applied linguistics. The volume is concluded by studies on contrastive linguistics and foreign language pedagogy.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Entraining Metaphors in the English Resultative Constructions

Extract



Natalya Schmidt, Trier

1 Introductory remarks

In the domain of human cognitive representation of causation, two fundamental forms have been identified by A. Michotte (1963), called entraining and launching in accordance with the corresponding basic causal perceptual impressions in caused motion scenes.

Those basic forms of causation of movement give rise to derived causative structures as a result of different cognitive processes (metaphorization, metonymy, conceptual blending, ...), which in natural language can be reflected by different means of expression; cf. Shibatani & Pardeshi (2001).

The term ‘causative continuum’ proposed by M Shibatani is actually an attempt to represent the intermediary category between direct and indirect causation and demonstrate that these different types form a continuous semantic space bounded by direct causation on the one end and indirect causation on the other (Shibatani & Pardeshi 2001: 96).

This point of view is considered to be false in the present approach, as there are two fundamental types of causation: entraining and launching. The task of the theory of causation is to identify and describe those types of causation, and their representation in different languages.

In English, entraining causation can be conveyed syntactically, through the construction traditionally called resultative, standing in metaphorical relation to the basic causative construction of the type

S – Verb (factitive) – O – Locative

She (S) carried (V) the child (O) off/away/to her house (Loc).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.