Competing Logics and Semi-professionals in Polish Public Administration
Przemysław Hensel, Beata Glinka
In this paper, we study the competing logics that shape development of the semi-profession (Harper, 2007) of public servant in Polish public administration. Development of a professional identity – defined as professional self-concept based on beliefs, values, motives, attributes, and experiences (Slay & Smith, 2011) – is shaped by a number of factors: public policy, educational system, business environment, culture, history, religion, and transfer of experiences and knowledge between generations. In this study, we concentrate on just one category of forces that shape professions, namely, institutional logics, defined as patterns of practices, beliefs, and values that shape decisions and actions in a given organizational field (Thornton & Ocasio, 2008).
This chapter is structured as follows: First we provide an overview of research on competing logics in the context of professions. Then we describe the methodology used in our study for data gathering and analysis. In the next part, we present the three competing logics that were discovered in the course of our study. In the last part of the text, we offer theoretical discussion of the findings.
Traditionally, bureaucrats have not been considered a part of any profession because the nature of their jobs lacks important defining professional traits. Most importantly, in many administrative systems, being a bureaucrat does not necessarily require prolonged education or possession of expert knowledge. However, the work of public servants in the developed countries is being increasingly professionalized. Administrators must constantly upgrade their knowledge and subscribe...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.