Samuel Becket – Subject – Negativity
Chapter Three. Objective Suffering
Laughter and screams constitute two modalities of the event that – as I am trying to prove – are the most important elements around which the sense of Beckett’s works is organized. So far, I have been considering the ontological and epistemological character of his works. Now, it is time to look at its anthropological dimension as revealed by the event. The question seems extremely complicated because, starting with the title, Beckett effectively sabotages all forms of subjectival cohesiveness. The paradox is built on a systematic breaking of the separate character of the individual, a process which is confirmed by the poetics of the text for the sake of the impersonal form of language and accompanied by an attempt to tell a story about a particular existence. Beckett juxtaposes and confronts both conscious and existential possibilities of subjectivity. While the first is concerned with the process of constituting individuality, based on the change in the position of subjectivity when confronted with the event, the second case is about representing the experience of a particular degree of intensity. In other words, the transfer from the event to experience is equivalent to the change of perspective from the epistemological-ontological to the existential. Not I could be read as a recording of an experience of existence, a figure that illustrates its innate characteristics: exposition, openness and – what is my primary interest – ecstasy.248 I am interested in its philosophical, rather than religious-mystical, interpretation. George...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.