Translated by Cain Elliott and Jan Burzyński
Chapter 3: Deconstruction of différance
Deconstruction of différance
Although Derrida’s philosophy in many respects resembles Deleuze’s thought – especially because they both posit the inextricable relation between the concepts of difference and repetition – Derrida takes on a radically different approach to the author of Difference and Repetition. As distinct from the latter’s philosophy, Derrida’s writings not only do not assume a systematic form, but they are also more indirect and, as it were, “shier.” Derrida does not articulate his premises and conclusions in an explicit manner and he does not have the ambition to create an ontology. In fact, if his philosophy is an ontology, it is so only implicitly and against itself. It maintains itself by the reading of other’s texts, and manifests itself especially as a method of reading, which trails through texts in search of difference, ambiguity, and equivocality. It is called “deconstruction.”
In order to tentatively describe both the goal of this method and the ways in which it operates, let us refer to several passages where Derrida lays out the principles of deconstruction. The passages that I shall discuss can be called “methodological.” Let us begin with Derrida’s “Ends of Man,” which is a brief and relatively clear outline of deconstruction.
The goal of deconstruction is to “shake the metaphysical tradition,” to disturb the traditional metaphysical system of concepts in a way that “the telos of presence,” which it presupposes, can be exposed as mystification.54 In order to achieve this...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.