Loading...

Refusal to License- Intellectual Property Rights as Abuse of Dominance

by Claudia Schmidt (Author)
©2010 Thesis XIV, 224 Pages

Summary

Refusal to license intellectual property rights (IPRs) are an ongoing topic within the enforcement of Article 102 TFEU (ex Article 82 EC). Nevertheless, so far an economic founded instrument to analyse these cases is missing. To close this gap, the Innovation Effects and Appropriability Test will be developed throughout this book. Innovation research has been showing that firms rely on more appropriation mechanisms than only IPRs. The availability of these alternative instruments depends on the involved technologies, the kind of innovation, the concerned industry and so on. Consequently, it is in the centre of the Innovation Effects and Appropriability Test to analyse whether the dominant firm could rely on other appropriation instruments to protect its innovation and to recoup its investments in R&D.

Details

Pages
XIV, 224
Year
2010
ISBN (PDF)
9783653005912
ISBN (Hardcover)
9783631610015
DOI
10.3726/978-3-653-00591-2
Language
English
Publication date
2012 (June)
Keywords
Compretition Policy Intellectual Property Innovation Economics Law
Published
Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 2010. XIV, 224 pp., num. tables and graphs

Biographical notes

Claudia Schmidt (Author)

Previous

Title: Refusal to License- Intellectual Property Rights as Abuse of Dominance