Loading...

India and its Neighbourhood

New Frontiers of Diplomacy

by Pratip Chattopadhyay (Volume editor) Raj Kothari (Volume editor)
©2026 Edited Collection VIII, 370 Pages

Summary

The volume attempts to contextualise emerging trends of Indian diplomacy toward its immediate and extended neighbourhood by focusing on bilateral diplomatic perception and counter perception and leveraging new frontiers of diplomacy in cricket, culture and AI. The volume demonstrates neighbourhood as a space of linkage-based management of commons. It argues that India’s neighbourhood diplomacy since 2014 is marked by an eagerness to mend fences with immediate neighbours and to build strategic partnerships with far away extra regional powers redefined as distant neighbours epitomized in Neighbourhood First policy. In the neighbourhood dynamics of the post-2014 period, India’s position has become mature, futuristic and innovative, celebrating the ancient Indian philosophy of oneness with the outside world (diplomacy) and oneness with self (atmnanirbhar/self-reliant), led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Table Of Contents

  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Contents
  • Introduction: Neighbourhood Dynamics and India’s Position: The Post-2014 Scenario (Pratip Chattopadhyay)
  • Part I Context
  • Democracy as the Context of Neighbourhood Diplomacy: Perspectives on South Asia (Ganga Thapa)
  • Understanding Perception of South Asian States on Rising India (Nanda Kishor MS)
  • Indo-Pacific as a Neighbourhood Construct: An Appraisal of India’s Approach (Swatilekha Bhattacharya)
  • Part II India’s Bilateral Relations With Neighbours: Prospects And Problems
  • India Factor in Bangladesh Politics: Analysis and Prognosis (Siddhartha Dasgupta)
  • Sri Lanka as a Trusted Strategic Ally: Advancing India’s Trade Integration in the South Asian Region (Nadeesh de Silva and Pavithra Jayawardena)
  • Diplomatic Relations Between India and Indonesia: Insights on Jokowi and Modi (Anup Shekhar Chakraborty)
  • India and Australia: The Security Dimensions of Indo-Pacific Conception of Regionalism (Biplab Debnath and Raja Lohar)
  • India’s Diplomatic Engagement with New Zealand: The Transformative Phase (2014–2025) (Aaditya Swaroop)
  • Part III India And Regions: A Neighbourhood Perspective
  • From Civilisational Friends to Strategic Partners: Defence, Security and Strategic Dimensions of India–Central Asia Relations (Mahesh Ranjan Debata and Narendra Kumar)
  • India and the Mekong Subregion in the Indo-Pacific Era (Narut Charoensri)
  • Diplomatic Engagements with the Islamic Neighbours in South Asia: Understanding Continuity and Change in India’s Foreign Policy (2014–2025) (Debasish Nandy)
  • India’s BIMSTEC Policy: Strategic Calculus, Security Cooperation and Limits of Regional Integration (Pradipta Roy)
  • Part IV Frontiers Of India’s Diplomacy In The Neighbourhood: Agents And Structures
  • Criticality of Bureaucracy in Foreign Policy-Making: Reflections on Recent Developments in India (Arindam Roy)
  • The Role of Personality and Leadership in Shaping India’s Foreign Policy in Neighbourhood (R. Radhakrishnan and Vinay Verma)
  • India’s Cricket Diplomacy in Neighbourhood: (Re)examining the Past and Present (Avipsu Halder)
  • Climate Crisis in South Asia: India’s Leadership Role in Curating a Concerted Approach Involving Her Neighbourhood (Jayita Mukherjee)
  • The New Frontier of India’s Neighbourhood Policy: Exploring the Impact of Cultural Diplomacy (Bisari Dey)
  • Economic Diplomacy and Mitigation of Geopolitical Tension: A Case of the Indian Subcontinent (Sazzad Nayeem and Fahim Fayzal)
  • Navigating the Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence (AI): India’s Role in Neighbourhood AI Governance (Rubina Pradhan and Amrita Purkayastha)
  • Conclusion: Roadmap for India’s Neighbourhood Engagement in Post-“Operation Sindoor” Phase (Raj Kumar Kothari)
  • Notes on Contributors
  • Index

Introduction Neighbourhood Dynamics and India’s Position: The Post-2014 Scenario

Pratip Chattopadhyay

Neighbourhood in international relations is a nomenclature that is given to that geopolitical space which has a common history, culture and civilisational linkages and proximate borders. Neighbourhood is a contested space in South Asia due to a chequered history of partition and geopolitical tensions. The living problems related to borders and cultural connectivity make South Asian neighbourhood a perennial flashpoint of animosity and tension where normal bilateral and multilateral engagements never occur smoothly and continuously. Diplomacy of the post-colonial nation-states that comprise South Asian neighbourhood space is guided by geopolitical historical legacies of psychological baggage as well as existing regional and global balance of political and economic power dynamics. In this context India’s approach to its South Asian neighbourhood has always been influenced by historical tendencies and contemporary requirements. Therefore India although being the biggest geopolitical space in the South Asian neighbourhood could neither create a permanent neighbourhood policy for South Asia nor develop a systematic neighbourhood culture in South Asia. The absence of a neighbourhood culture of togetherness and belonging in South Asia is matched with presence of an equal culture of politics (attitude driven by interest), possession (attitude driven by reimagination over border) and power (attitude driven by eagerness to connect with extra-regional power). India’s relationship with neighbours has traversed a full cycle from the approach in 1958 to that in 2025 which is to define neighbours going beyond geographical proximity by including both immediate, distant and even far away nation-states keeping in mind cultural, civilisational and political linkages. This inclination on part of India to view neighbourhood as a broad spectrum of attitudinal linkages beyond geographical linkages has created apprehension among immediate neighbours of India in South Asia about its intention to create everlasting bonding with them. This apprehension about intention has created a systemic dystopia in the imagination of South Asian nation-states about the neighbourhood space. Such a situation is fall out of the nature and practice of foreign policy of the South Asian nation-states. Foreign policy of these nation-states including India is created in a post-colonial setting with a focus on internal development rather than external exchanges in immediate neighbourhood. Even after creating a basic developmental milieu the habit of being in touch with extra-regional nation-states for aid and other benefits as in immediate independence period continued. Among the foreign policies of South Asian nation-states, Indian foreign policy has always been under scanner both in South Asian and western media. In Indian foreign policy psyche the initial exuberance with neighbourly relation evaporated with the sudden unilateral Chinese attack in 1962. Thereafter India was in search for opportunity to establish its regional presence and assistance to Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971 provided that. However, this episode of India’s regional emergence was perceived by smaller neighbours of India as the height of expression of its dominating presence. The result of this impression among its immediate neighbours is an idea of big brother presence in India and initiated the formation of SAARC in 1985. Indian foreign policy mandarins irrespective of such perception went ahead with sending peacekeeping mission in Sri Lanka in 1988 that accentuated the negative image of crafting a muscular foreign policy by India in the neighbourhood. With the end of Cold War the entire South Asian neighbourhood was seen as a strategic space by the United States with its aim to consolidate its influence in the region vis-a-vis Chinese strategy of string of pearls to encircle India (not only encircling India as a geographical space but also encircling the liberal democratic secular idea). Indian foreign policy mission in post-Cold War period tried to gain some ground in its immediate neighbourhood through policy of non-reciprocity vide Gujral Doctrine and then Prime Minister Vajpayee’s transport and sports diplomacy. It is another research question and matter of different discussion whether such policy stances were intended to instil confidence among neighbours or lessen the impact of China’s influence. In the midst of 9/11 incident and the bandwagoning of liberal ethos of international order, India started floating it’s economic and political diplomacy by engaging and spearheading some important multilaterals and plurilaterals like IBSA, BRICS, BIMSTEC. Between 2004 and 2014 India again reoriented it’s neighbourhood strategy followed by the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attack with remembrance of 2001 terrorist attack in Parliament. Such reorientation attempt was coupled with India’s aspiration to be at the global high table of diplomacy for which it went beyond domestic political chaos to ink Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal. However, all these aspect of extra-region looking Indian foreign policy was matched in a lukewarm manner with its rhetoric of friendly policy towards immediate neighbours vis-a-vis its economic engagement with South East Asia reflected in groupings like India–ASEAN Dialogue forum. While throughout the entire period of Cold War, foreign policy was value-based (non-aligned) and neighbourhood diplomacy was half-hearted, in post-Cold War period foreign policy of India till 2014 was multilateral (multipolarity) and diplomacy was one of maintaining balance in neighbourhood to restrict drift of neighbours away towards China. So it can be said diplomacy of India from 1947 to 2014 towards South Asia is a story of swing between Pakistan-centricity and China-centricity.

With coming of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2014, Indian foreign policy has diversified and matured with widespread presence in world affairs not in multilaterals only but also in bilateral from land to marine from aerospace to agricultural knowledge sharing. Diplomatic order of the world soon changed its course with Donald Trump as President of the United States and Chinese President stretching tenure of office to lifelong along with the offensive postures of Russian President Putin. In the South Asian backyard India under Prime Minister Modi started with “breakthrough diplomacy” of “Neighbourhood First” by inviting leaders from South Asia in swearing-in ceremony in his first term and then inviting BIMSTEC members in swearing-in ceremony in his second term. Between 2014 and 2024 India primarily invested much of its goodwill diplomacy in neighbourhood but it backfired with terrorist attacks from Pakistan, with allegations from Nepal about highhandedness in drafting it’s 2015 Constitution, with anti-Indian sentiment escalating in Bangladesh even after the bonhomie of swanali odhyay (golden era) of 2021 marking 50th year of bilateral, with anti-Indian sentiment becoming political issue in Maldives and Bhutan still not totally committed to strategic bonhomie with India and the Taliban dispensation in Afghanistan is far from establishing diplomatic tie ups. Indian foreign policy in post-COVID world order emerged as a major supplier of essential commons during and after lockdown, re-energised ties with African continent with regular India–Africa summits, reconnecting with “diasporas” by celebrating Provasi Bharatiya Divas, linking strategically with small island nations of Indo-Pacific by extending lines of credit, crafting a non-compromising national interest-based stance on global policy issues rooted in civilisational heritage and putting up a new diplomatic order where Bharatiya mode of democratic rule-based approach is given credence. The change that has taken place both in Indian foreign policy and diplomacy is that of approach where non-appeasement instead of non-alignment rules and hence India is flexible in maintaining multialignment.

The COVID pandemic period ushered a new image of atmnanirbhar or self-reliant India to the world and more so to its immediate and extended neighbourhood due to its ability to produce vaccines and sending them to all nation-states in times of need. So India foreign policy in post-COVID world order is not only a receiver of global norms and aids but also as a producer of global requirements. Consequently India’s diplomacy changed its orientation to adopt a managerial role in global politics shedding the past mode of being at the receiving end. Today global problems need India-designed solutions as was exemplified in the way G20 Delhi Declaration curated way to have “goals” that are already been made feasible in Indian setting like Digital Public Infrastructure, Lifestyle for Sustainable Development, Women-led Development and advances in AI-based research. In this moment of India taking a leading role in world politics, it is very important to understand how India perceives it’s immediate neighbourhood and how India’s immediate neighbourhood perceives India. The post-COVID world order in 2025 is a space where inward attention is the norm of nation-states from the United States to China. Even Russia’s so-called aggression is a fall out of its attention to rebuild the former Soviet Union. Hardly today any nation-states are eager to share global commons and are in a withdrawal mode. In this context India has a task to manage and secure its borders which inter alia forces it to be concerned in the happenings in its immediate neighbourhood. But whenever it gets concerned and put its views on the issues of turmoil in the immediate neighbourhood with any of its bordering nation-states the lingering spectre of “Big Brother” syndrome crops up. Even when it tries to invest in immediate neighbouring countries or steps in with bucket of aid the domestic political constituency in immediate neighbourhood scrutinises it critically. So the basic question is how India should engage them diplomatically and the new possible avenues of diplomacy that India could undertake to build confidence and build a strategic culture of unity with geoeconomic imperative. This edited volume with nineteen important chapters along with a concluding section for future roadmap of India’s neighbourhood diplomacy is a humble attempt in that direction.

In the Volume

The first part of the volume titled Context contains three chapters. Ganga Thapa writes on the political context of democracy and links neighbourhood policy stance of South Asian nation-states with it. Nanda Kishor elaborates psychological context of perception of South Asian states towards India in its contemporary rising mode. Swatilekha Bhattacharya highlights the geopolitical context of Indo-Pacific space and how India curates a shifting approach to bilateral and multilateral negotiations in this sphere. According to Ganga Thapa recent years have witnessed India’s escalating prominence in South Asia on the global stage, prompting concerns regarding its pursuit of peaceful development. In this context, Thapa tries to explore the broader question of whether South Asia will collectively strive for the common good, particularly by examining whether India, whose position in the region is akin to that of an “elephant in the room,” will adopt a genuine policy of unforced consensus. Such a policy would involve fostering harmonious relations within South Asia through cooperation. However, this inquiry goes beyond mere speculation. India’s physical connections with neighbouring countries such as Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, Myanmar, and even Afghanistan, highlight the intricate web of regional interdependencies. In navigating these relationships, India, Thapa points out, is bound to prioritise fostering all interests and viewpoints within the region together, rather than asserting superiority alone. Presenting an unsentimental audit of India’s foreign policy towards the South Asian neighbours, Nanda Kishor reveals that India did whatever was possible in its capacity but unfortunately many did not work and at times in backfired too. The hermeneutics are very important in foreign policy and this was proved right when Narendra Modi-led government introduced Neighbourhood First Policy and the Bharatiya Janata Party introduced Panchamrit. As Kautilya mentions in Arthashastra, one cannot completely satisfy the neighbours as they would never be satisfied yet India since 2014 has done benevolent things. Knowing the perceptions of the neighbours would allow India’s augment its efforts in the right direction. In this context Nanda Kishor attempts integrating Panchamrit, rooted in India’s culture to enhance the neighbourhood first policy. Swatilekha Bhattacharya argues that India’s multilateral diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific has evolved as a strategic response to the changing global perception of Indo-Pacific area, reflecting both its aspirations as an emerging global power and a leading voice of the Global South. Bhattacharya delves into the emerging opportunities for India in the Indo-Pacific region which are both diverse and complicated. Bhattacharya in the chapter further examines how geographic advantage of the Indian landmass extending into the Indian Ocean gives India a considerable military edge in the region, which must be safeguarded and strengthened. Additionally Bhattacharya also examines how post-2014 era represents a transitional era in India’s approach to Indo-Pacific gradually adopting a more outwardly oriented, blue-water and strategically assertive role. The geopolitical problem that it must confront is different from the earlier days, and India must keep using its alliances to make the sea lanes of communication rule-based.

The second section titled Bilateral Relation with Neighbours: Problem and Prospects consists five chapters focusing on immediate neighbours like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka and then on distant neighbours like Indonesia, Australia and New Zealand. Siddhartha Dasgupta focuses on bilateral diplomacy between India and Bangladesh focusing on Bangladesh’s domestic political and psychological perception about India. According to Dasgupta sharp changes in Bangladesh’s internal political configurations have altered bilateral ties and the two conceptual domains where we see this phenomenon in operation are identity politics and geo-strategy which remain as important in 2025 as they were in 1971. The aggressive religious majoritarianism post-August 2024 has shrunk the space they hitherto enjoyed. There is a growing tendency to view certain Hindu religious organisations as agencies of an inimical Indian state. Social organisations like the Hindu-Bouddha-Christian Oikya Parishad have also failed to strengthen the minority groups in the national social matrix. The narrative espousing liberal secular Bengali identity involving Tagore, Nazrul, Lalan Fakir, Hasan Raja and many more intellectuals and observing festivals like Nabobarsha (Bengali New Year) has had a diminishing return in Bangladesh over the years. The chapter argues that while Indian strengths and weaknesses and more importantly perceptions about India are used as crucial and powerful political tools in almost all the neighbouring countries in South Asia for domestic political ends, the trend is much more visible and pronounced in Bangladesh. Pavithra Jayawardena and Nadeesh de Silva highlight Sri Lanka’s relationship with India in post-Araghalaya period wherein it was only India who came forward for help by extending a USD 1 billion credit line to Sri Lanka. The credit line, which was a part of a USD 4 billion assistance, was scheduled to end in March 2022. Why did not China come forward to save Sri Lanka? How did the relations of Sri Lanka progress with India during the post-Aragalaya period and what are their implications for the South Asian region? These are the main questions the chapter aims to answer. Using process tracing, the chapter identifies the causal relations of the key incidents and events of Sri Lankan foreign policy from the economic crisis period and its aftermath. It makes the argument that from a bandwagoning approach towards China, Sri Lanka’s approach has shifted to a hedging approach under President Ranil Wickramasinghe. It further argues that for this shift, not only the leaders’ views but the economic and political changes at the domestic society have played an important role. The next chapter by Anup Shekhar Chakraborty focuses on the latest period of India–Indonesia relationship keeping in hindsight the roots of this relation in historical legacies. This chapter examines the current diplomatic ties between Indonesia and India, highlighting the influential leaders who have played pivotal roles in these interactions. The chapter examines the alignment of Jokowi’s vision for Indonesia with Modi’s policies, exploring the economic, political, and cultural connections that have fortified the relationship between the two countries. Chakraborty demonstrates how this relationship holds the promise of enhancing economic connections between the two nations while simultaneously promoting increased collaboration in tackling common issues like climate change, security threats, accessible healthcare and religious polarisation. Biplab Debnath and Raja Lohar in the next chapter come with a detailed analysis of relationship within Indo-Pacific framework between India and Australia wherein many of the assumptions of Australia’s regional security align with those of India. Debnath and Lohar delineate the what and how of convergence of strategic imaginaries of security in the conception of Indo-Pacific policy in both India and Australia. Australia’s strategic policies, including Australia’s 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper, 2023 Defence Strategic Review and Indo-Pacific policy, focus on maintaining the US-led liberal order, ASEAN centrality, a strategy of denial of adversary’s presence, ensuring freedom of navigation and order, and deepening partnership with littorals of the Indo-Pacific which more denotes the liberal-institutionalist approach. The chapter concludes arguing that despite India’s priority in the Indian Ocean and Australia’s Eastern Pacific, their priorities meet in the Southeast Asian countries. The last chapter in this section by Aaditya Swaroop focuses on India–New Zealand relationship during the tenure of Prime Minister Modi and argues that it has been a transformational phase in the bilateral relationship. This chapter studies the major changes in India–New Zealand relations since the Modi era, considering the reasons for more involvement, the ways cooperation has become formalised and what has been achieved in different sectors. The chapter concludes by arguing that as democracies with a shared commitment to a rules-based order, but positioned differently in international hierarchies of power – their capacity to deliver significant cooperation in the face of differences of both scale of operation, diplomatic practice and developmental stage, suggests the potential of adaptable relationships that do not rely on fixed alliance frames.

Details

Pages
VIII, 370
Publication Year
2026
ISBN (PDF)
9781805841364
ISBN (ePUB)
9781805841371
ISBN (Softcover)
9781805841357
DOI
10.3726/b23207
Language
English
Publication date
2026 (October)
Keywords
India Neighbourhood Diplomacy Narendra Modi South Asia CentralAsia South-east Asia Management Regional Commons Cricket Culture Artificial Intelligence Indo-Pacific Democracy BIMSTEC Ganga-Mekong Bangladesh Operation Sindoor Raj Kumar Kothari Pratip Chattopadhyay
Published
Chennai, Berlin, Bruxelles, Lausanne, New York, Oxford, 2026. viii, 370 pp., 4 fig. b/w, 2 tables.
Product Safety
Peter Lang Group AG

Biographical notes

Pratip Chattopadhyay (Volume editor) Raj Kothari (Volume editor)

Raj Kumar Kothari is presently Professor, Department of Political Science, Diamond Harbour Women’s University, West Bengal, India. He was the former Vice-Chancellor of Sanskrit College and University Kolkata (2023–26). Earlier he was Professor and Head, Department of Political Science with Rural Administration, Vidyasagar University, West Bengal. Pratip Chattopadhyay is Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India. He is a board member of Research Committee 34 on Quality of Democracy, International Political Science Association(2025–27) and Joint Secretary, Jadavpur Association of International Relations(2025–27). He was a former Associate at Indian Institute of Advanced Studies, Simla(2014–16) and Honorary Deputy Director at Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies(2022–24). He is the recipient of Young Political Science Award in 2025 by Indian Political Science Association.

Previous

Title: India and its Neighbourhood