Approaches to the Monism of Proclus the Neoplatonist
Metaphysical and Epistemological Foundations
Summary
Excerpt
Table Of Contents
- Cover
- Half Title
- Title
- Copyright
- Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Chapter I The relationship between archetypes and images according to Proclus: The metaphysical immanence
- Introduction
- I. 1. Forms and parts of the body
- I. 2. Forms and accidents
- I. 3. Forms and technique
- I. 4. Forms and evil
- I. 5. Towards a quasi-epistemological foundation
- Conclusions
- Chapter II Monistic polytheism according to Proclus: The “agonizing adventures” of analogy
- Introduction
- II. 1. Scientific premises
- II. 2. The relation of the monad with the multitude
- II. 3. The causal function of mediations
- II. 4. The immanent presence of the Good
- II. 5. The multimodal presence of Ideas-Forms
- II. 6. The prospect of an imminent meeting of the sensible with the metaphysical world
- II. 7. Plato’s Parmenides and the metaphysical and cosmological foundations
- II. 8. The Good reverts in order to validate ontological integrities and projections
- II. 9. Extensions
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
Contents
Chapter II Monistic polytheism according to Proclus: The “agonizing adventures” of analogy
Introduction
The Neoplatonic School of Athens represents, in a broad sense, the final period of the Academy, which Plato founded after his return from his first trip to Sicily in 387 BC. However, between the initial and final periods of the Academy, historical and intellectual conditions inevitably changed significantly. The last chronologically scholars of the Neoplatonic period of the Academy include Plutarch of Athens (350–432 AD), who is considered the first Neoplatonist of Athens, Syrianus (432–37 AD), Proclus (412–85 AD), and Damascius (458–? AD). They were, in fact, thinkers who were surrounded by a mature group of collaborators, a factor that contributed to the emergence of a body of writings that was impressive both in terms of quantity and scientific concerns. On the whole, from a religious-theological point of view, they belonged to the “faction” of the nationalists, with a clear insistence on polytheism, which they organised under the terms of a hierarchical paradigm. As an illustration, we refer to the following verse of Proclus, which belongs to the broader thematic section dealing with the laws which govern the metaphysical world and which are described in their application through the activities of those gods who were the reference persons of the ancient Greek religious tradition:
Τῶν μὲν γὰρ εἰμαρμένων νόμων οὐ μόνον θεοὶ κρείττους, ἀλλὰ καὶ ψυχαὶ μερικαὶ ζῶσαι κατὰ νοῦν καὶ τῷ τῆς προνοίας ἑαυτὰς ἐπιδοῦσαι φωτί· καὶ τῶν Διίων νόμων οἱ Κρόνιοι θεοὶ κατ’ οὐσίαν ἐξῄρηνται, καὶ τῶν Κρονίων οἱ συνεκτικοὶ καὶ τελεσιουργοί· τῷ δὲ τῆς Ἀδραστείας θεσμῷ πάντα ὑπήκοα, καὶ πᾶσαι διανομαὶ θεῶν καὶ μέτρα πάντα καὶ φρουραὶ διὰ τοῦτον ὑφεστήκασι.1
Details
- Pages
- 128
- Publication Year
- 2026
- ISBN (PDF)
- 9783631950623
- ISBN (ePUB)
- 9783631950630
- ISBN (Softcover)
- 9783631950616
- DOI
- 10.3726/b23654
- Language
- English
- Publication date
- 2026 (September)
- Keywords
- Lydia Petridou Christos Terezis Good multitude monad evil accidents Dualism Plato Plato’s Theology analogy Commentary on Parmenides Ideas-Forms epistemology metaphysics Monism Proclus Neoplatonism
- Published
- Berlin, Bruxelles, Chennai, Lausanne, New York, Oxford, 2026. 128 pp.
- Product Safety
- Peter Lang Group AG