Loading...

Pragmatic approaches to argumentation

by Ramy Younis (Volume editor) Steve Oswald (Volume editor)
©2026 Edited Collection 300 Pages
Series: Sciences pour la communication, Volume 141

Available soon

Summary

Argumentation theory and pragmatics are closely connected fields of research that have mutually informed one another for decades, sharing a concern with the study of communicative behavior.
This edited volume presents novel research at the intersection of the two disciplines. All contributions share a pragmatic approach to the linguistic dimension of argumentative practices and highlight how integrating these disciplines can yield new insights into argumentative discourse.
The volume showcases the richness of work conducted at the pragmatics and argumentation interface, analyzing argumentation across different settings and adopting a variety of theoretical frameworks and methodologies, spanning qualitative to quantitative approaches. Special attention is given to the role that the analysis of data from different communicative contexts plays in answering research questions, underscoring how the study of argumentation draws on the typically pragmatic sensitivity to contextual parameters.

Details

Pages
300
Publication Year
2026
ISBN (Softcover)
9783034369671
Language
English
Keywords
Linguistics Pragmatics Argumentation Qualitative Analysis Quantitative Analysis Communication Corpus Linguistics
Product Safety
Peter Lang Group AG

Biographical notes

Ramy Younis (Volume editor) Steve Oswald (Volume editor)

Ramy Younis is a doctoral researcher at the University of Fribourg. His main research interests are in argumentation, cognition, and linguistics. He is currently conducting empirical research on the persuasive effects of reformulation practices, such as the steel man and the straw man, from the viewpoints of rhetoric, argumentation, and pragmatics. Steve Oswald is Titular Professor in English Linguistics at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland. His research interests lie at the interface between discourse, language and cognition and he has worked extensively on the role of influence in communication (e.g., when communication is non-cooperative, deceptive, persuasive or argumentative). His current research projects and publications are devoted to the role of pragmatic meaning in argumentative processes, which he approaches from both theoretical and experimental perspectives.

Previous

Title: Pragmatic approaches to argumentation