Chapter 7 Student-to-Student Harassment, Discrimination, Hazing, and Violence 167
CHAPTER 7 Student-to-Student Harassment, Discrimination, Hazing, and Violence For most organ izations, c ustomer-to-customer crime is not a se rious loss- prevention c oncern. Two brawlers i n a bar wil l pr obably fin d themselves arrested or at least evicted. Two shop pers struggl ing over the lat est version o f Play Stat ion will li kely suffer a sim ilar fate. While t he American common law may entertain a theor y or t wo of liabili ty, such i nteractions simply are not high on the list of litigation risks of most corporate counsels. Need we say that institutions of higher learning are different in this regard? Our “customers” are our concerns in ways that only K–12 schools (and perhaps some landlords) can appreciate. When a student poses a threat to his classmates, when a frater nity harasses gays or b lacks or Asians on yo ur campus, or when new ple dges are i nduced t o binge drink, t he university fac es seri ous l iability problems. Students themselves can be held liable for the p ersonal injuries they cause. In days of yore this sta tement was less solid than it is now, when 18— the age of most freshmen—is deemed to be the age of majori ty for most purposes. How- ever, t his cha pter, as al l the others, w ill focus on the insti tution’s l iability for student misdeeds. Student-to-Student Harassment and Discrimination Federal...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.