Show Less

Academic Discourse Across Disciplines

Series:

Edited By Ken Hyland and Marina Bondi

This volume reflects the emerging interest in cross-disciplinary variation in both spoken and written academic English, exploring the conventions and modes of persuasion characteristic of different disciplines and which help define academic inquiry. This collection brings together chapters by applied linguists and EAP practitioners from seven different countries. The authors draw on various specialised spoken and written corpora to illustrate the notion of variation and to explore the concept of discipline and the different methodologies they use to investigate these corpora. The book also seeks to make explicit the valuable links that can be made between research into academic speech and writing as text, as process, and as social practice.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Variation in Written Interaction

Extract

DAVIDE SIMONE GIANNONI Book Acknowledgements across Disciplines and Texts 1. Introduction1 Following a number of recent studies on the language of acknowledgements in research articles (Giannoni 1998; 2002) and in postgraduate dissertations by native (Gesuato 2003, 2004a) and non- native speakers (Hyland 2003; Hyland / Tse 2004a, 2004b), this chapter explores their variation in academic monographs (hence Book AKs) as an expression of the ‘cultural repertoire’ and ‘rules of discourse’ of academia (Brodkey 1987: 18-23). Book AKs constitute the earliest form of written acknowledgement within the research genre system, originating from the ‘front matter’ printed in 17th century monographs, which ranged from prefatory epistles and advertisements to forewords and dedications to patrons or friends (cf. Roberts 2003a, 2003b). Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy (1638), for instance, includes a dedicatory page with poems, followed by a ‘satirical preface’ and an address to the reader; the treatises in More’s Philosophical Writings (1662) all open with an epistle dedicatory and a preface; Newton’s Opticks (1704) is introduced by a short advertisement. Research article acknowledgements may be regarded as an offshoot of the Book AKs genre and are today equally pervasive. Diachronic studies by Cronin et al. (2003, 2004) show a sharp increase in their use over the last century, especially since the 1970s. ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ * I am grateful to Vijay Bhatia and other Colloquium participants for their valuable comments on this paper. Thanks also to Richard Dury drawing my attention to Bauerlein’s (2001) article. Davide Simone Giannoni 152 The proportion of acknowledgement-bearing journal articles in philosophy,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.