James Loder, Mystical Spirituality, and James Hillman
These areas of focus and related questions encompass broad landscapes. This book places a magnifying glass on one piece of the terrain by engaging the work of philosopher, theologian, and psychologist James Loder, mystical spirituality scholars Andrew Louth, Bernard McGinn, Denys Turner, and Mark McIntosh, and archetypal movement founder James Hillman. Without denying differences, this work is the first analysis to identify connections among these thinkers. The significance of the connections is both substantive and methodological for intra- and inter-faith (broadly understood) spirituality discussion, as well as for the engagement of the Christian church with the culture of the twenty-first century.
Chapter Six Conclusions 273
Chapter 6: Conclusions In ‘connecting the dots’ among Loder’s theory, mystical spirituality as presented by Louth, McGinn, Turner, and McIntosh, and Hillman’s theory, I have argued the following: First, that Loder’s theory fills the interdisciplinary lacunae in the study of mystical spirituality noted and bemoaned by Louth, McGinn, Turner, and McIntosh. All five authors focus on ‘deep, transforming engagement with God’ as a mediated immediacy in which experience and interpretation, spirituality and theology, are inter-twined. However, my assertion of this shared focus does not deny the many differences among the analyses of these five authors and their personal theological matrices. I place my assertion in the public domain to invite consideration and discussion. Second, I have argued that Loder’s theory can contribute to the debated issue of particularity and universality in spirituality discourse in at least two ways. The first way is as a view from below. Loder’s logic provides a conceptual framework for understanding the movement of human knowing as relational and transformational; this movement can be understood as the locus of what is referred to as human self-transcendence and can facilitate discussion among diverse human spiritualities without synthesis or reduction. For example, Hillman’s theory can be understood through the logic without violation of terms or concepts. The second way is as an approach to Christian spirituality that unites views from below and above, valid across Christian traditions. The transformation of transformational and relational knowing (‘transformation transformed’) places all human knowing within a four dimensional Trinitarian reality that transforms...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.