-
Towards an Empirical Verification of the Gravitational Pull Hypothesis
Evidence from the COVALT Corpus©2024 Edited Collection -
Critical Period Hypothesis Revisited
The Impact of Age on Ultimate Attainment in the Pronunciation of a Foreign Language - Including CD©2009 Thesis -
The Earth as a Living Superorganism
From the Scientific Gaia (Hypothesis) to the Metaphysics of Nature©2005 Thesis -
Kritische Periode oder altersspezifischer Antrieb
Was erklärt den Altersfaktor im Zweitspracherwerb?- Eine empirische Fallstudie zum ungesteuerten Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen durch russische Lerner unterschiedlichen Alters©2009 Thesis -
Haftung für Falschinformation des Sekundärmarktes
©2004 Thesis -
Hermeneutic Commentaries
ISSN: 1043-5735
"The question of interpretation of the text is at the center of this collection of monographs and commentaries on classical literatures. Interpretation starts with the realisation that at the outset, the sense of a text is an hypothesis to be gradually and constantly revised and ascertained. Grammar, syntax, and rhetoric are certainly the necessary part for this critical operation, but they fall short of giving full sense to the signification of the text. A philological commentary establishes the texts as close as possible to the authors text, and provides the information necessary for modern readers to understand what the text meant to its contemporary users. But besides the impossibility of achieving this task fully, this sort of information does not provide the sense of the text as it opens itself to the questions of its individuality and universality, its historicity and its transhistorical iterability, as it hides the rules and game of its composition, its difference in order to show its identity. These opposite poles are constantly united and create a tension, a continuous oscillation that are the very domaine of the interpretative analysis, and the conditions of the texts ever emerging sense . The hermeneutic circle, through which the critical hypothesis is constantly revised and made more precise, can be viewed also as a sort of deconstructive operation, a decomposing of the text in order to recompose it around its now discovered rules and games, of which the author is not necessarily always fully aware. Because of these conditions the sense of a text is more open to the critics than to its author; this point makes the critics conscious that as they are reading, they are in some way writing the text." "The question of interpretation of the text is at the center of this collection of monographs and commentaries on classical literatures. Interpretation starts with the realisation that at the outset, the sense of a text is an hypothesis to be gradually and constantly revised and ascertained. Grammar, syntax, and rhetoric are certainly the necessary part for this critical operation, but they fall short of giving full sense to the signification of the text. A philological commentary establishes the texts as close as possible to the authors text, and provides the information necessary for modern readers to understand what the text meant to its contemporary users. But besides the impossibility of achieving this task fully, this sort of information does not provide the sense of the text as it opens itself to the questions of its individuality and universality, its historicity and its transhistorical iterability, as it hides the rules and game of its composition, its difference in order to show its identity. These opposite poles are constantly united and create a tension, a continuous oscillation that are the very domaine of the interpretative analysis, and the conditions of the texts ever emerging sense . The hermeneutic circle, through which the critical hypothesis is constantly revised and made more precise, can be viewed also as a sort of deconstructive operation, a decomposing of the text in order to recompose it around its now discovered rules and games, of which the author is not necessarily always fully aware. Because of these conditions the sense of a text is more open to the critics than to its author; this point makes the critics conscious that as they are reading, they are in some way writing the text." "The question of interpretation of the text is at the center of this collection of monographs and commentaries on classical literatures. Interpretation starts with the realisation that at the outset, the sense of a text is an hypothesis to be gradually and constantly revised and ascertained. Grammar, syntax, and rhetoric are certainly the necessary part for this critical operation, but they fall short of giving full sense to the signification of the text. A philological commentary establishes the texts as close as possible to the authors text, and provides the information necessary for modern readers to understand what the text meant to its contemporary users. But besides the impossibility of achieving this task fully, this sort of information does not provide the sense of the text as it opens itself to the questions of its individuality and universality, its historicity and its transhistorical iterability, as it hides the rules and game of its composition, its difference in order to show its identity. These opposite poles are constantly united and create a tension, a continuous oscillation that are the very domaine of the interpretative analysis, and the conditions of the texts ever emerging sense . The hermeneutic circle, through which the critical hypothesis is constantly revised and made more precise, can be viewed also as a sort of deconstructive operation, a decomposing of the text in order to recompose it around its now discovered rules and games, of which the author is not necessarily always fully aware. Because of these conditions the sense of a text is more open to the critics than to its author; this point makes the critics conscious that as they are reading, they are in some way writing the text."
1 publications
-
Platzierung und Lokalisierung von Objekten im Raum
Zur Versprachlichung im Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen©2012 Thesis -
The Evangelicals and the Synoptic Problem
©2014 Monographs -
Gender and Ideology in Translation: - Do Women and Men Translate Differently?
A Contrastive Analysis from Italian into English©2007 Thesis -
The Influence of Text Type on Word Order of Old Germanic Languages
A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study of Old English and Old High German©2010 Thesis -
Translation, Manipulation and Interpreting
©2009 Thesis -
The System Reform of the Economic and Monetary Union (2010-2022)
Dynamics-Successes-Failures©2023 Monographs -
Intergroup Contact between Germans and Turkish Immigrants Living in Germany
Exploring Tandem Language Classes as a Means to Reduce Prejudice©2018 Thesis -
Life Without Media
©2013 Textbook -
La Forma del Sogno. La rappresentazione del sogno in romanzi tedeschi e francesi degli anni '70 tra filologia e fisiologia
Die Form des Traums. Die Traumdarstellung in deutschen und französischen Romanen der 70er Jahre zwischen Philologie und Physiologie©2011 Monographs -
Whose Truth? Which Rationality?
John Hick’s Pluralist Strategies for the Management of Conflicting Truth Claims among the World Religions©2008 Thesis -
Regularities in the Behaviour of Russian Phrasal Idioms
©2004 Monographs -
Migration and Creation in Aztec and Maya literature
©2023 Monographs