-
Digital Marketing Applications
©2019 Edited Collection -
Marketing im globalen Wettbewerb / Marketing & Global Competition
ISSN: 1867-8424
The series Marketing & Global Competition aims at providing a forum for scholars in Business and Management with an interest in Media Studies. Topics include (among others) the influence of Web 2.0 on marketing via user- generated contents. The series editor, Professor Oliver P. Heil (Ph.D.), specializes in Competitive Market Signaling, Strategic Marketing, and Social Networks.
2 publications
-
Cultural Barriers to the Success of Foreign Media Content
Western Media in China, India, and Japan©2010 Monographs -
Information Propagation on the Web 2.0
Two Essays on the Propagation of User-Generated Content and How It Is Affected by Social Networks©2012 Thesis -
Innovations and Implications of Persuasive Narrative
©2020 Edited Collection -
Transformation und Strategieentwicklung im Musikmarkt
Musik und Gemeinschaft in der digitalen Mediamorphose©2011 Thesis -
Digital Platforms and Cultural Industries
©2018 Edited Collection -
Cross-Media Promotion
©2010 Textbook -
Culture’s Influence on the Websites of German and Chinese Companies
An Analysis of Cultural Diversity on the Internet©2022 Thesis -
Gastronomy Attractions and Practices in Tourism
©2023 Edited Collection -
Gastronomy and Hospitality Studies in Tourism
©2021 Edited Collection -
New Media and Public Relations – Third Edition
©2017 Textbook -
Authorship, Literary Production and Censorship in the Late-Nineteenth Century
Gissing-Hamsun-Halit Ziya©2020 Monographs -
Information and Persuasion
Studies in Linguistics, Literature, Culture, and Discourse Analysis©2017 Edited Collection -
Social sciences via network analysis and computation
©2015 Conference proceedings -
Making Online News- Volume 2
Newsroom Ethnographies in the Second Decade of Internet Journalism©2011 Textbook -
Changing Democracy and Systems of Differences and Adjustments
"The series is intended as a collection of original and critical political-philosophicalworks as well as interdisciplinary studies on contemporary trends within democracy, its counter-actors, and transparentglobal market players. Authors representing various backgrounds and standpoints are encouraged in order to engage in the political philosophy; theoretical and mathematical analyses on politics; cyber society; environments; economics; civil, constitutional, and international law (e.g. legal transplants); human rights; social psychology; and sociology. The series used to collect the best global achievements and standards. Accordingly, the series has been provided in Spanish, Japanese, [Modern] Greek, German, French, and English but all double-peer-reviewed and accepted manuscripts should contain an English translation of its detailed contents and a résumé written in English. The world of the social has been rich enough to suggest no leading theoretical standpoint and no approaches of investigations are expected as imposed to the subject but normative studies on changing democracy and systems of differences and adjustments are not preferred because every non-changeable thing/idea disappears."
1 publications
-
Post-Anthropocentric Inquiry
In recent years, critical researchers, educators, and activists have become aware of the problems and limitations that have resulted by placing the ‘human’ at the center of all societal conceptualizations, concerns, and practices. Across fields, ranging from medical research laboratory practices—to the construction of the humanities—to the social sciences—to environmental studies (just to name a few), this anthropocentric focus is being called to question. The goal of this book series is to provide scholars and readers with critical opportunities to contest this anthropocentrism, (1) by creating a textual field of Post-Anthropocentric Inquiry that generates critical spaces for (re)thinking philosophies, knowledges, and ways of being/living and performing, as well as methodologies and inquiries, that decenter the human, (2) while at the same time attempting always/already to actively transform inequities and injustices performed by human privilege on nonhuman others, traditionally disqualified human others, and the natural world more broadly. This Post-Anthropocentric Inquiry can represent difference and the multiple, while at the same time exploring and welcoming notions of indistinction. Work that further develops and expands current notions of becoming (animal, earth), new feminist materialisms, critical posthuman sensibilities, hybrid existences (past and present) are example locations from which an intersectional, non-anthropocentric politics may emerge. Additionally, post-anthropocentric inquiry and activism will always include the unthought, not-yet-considered modes of living, thinking, research while critically acknowledging that alternatives can create new dualisms, new forms of human privilege, and are not always liberatory for those labeled not human or for those human beings who have traditionally been marginalized. Further, post-anthropocentric scholarship acknowledges, and attempts to (1) transform, the current post-anthropocentric predicament that facilitates neoliberal capitalism as all forms of life, matter, and relations have been/are constructed to serve market economies, and (2) examine the unprecedented human/nonhuman interaction with the increasingly intrusive and intimate technological order. Post-anthropocentric inquiry is necessary as related to these contemporary aggressive, and all-encompassing post-human conditions. Single or multiple authored manuscripts are encouraged that facilitate the development of Post-Anthropocentric Inquiry by addressing one issue, multiple issues, research purposes, methodologies, and/or forms of activism. Over a wide range of volumes that cross disciplines, the series will address broad issues, as mentioned above, and questions like the following: What is post-anthropocentric inquiry? What is made possible, enabled by post-anthropocentric approaches and research methodologies? How is post-anthropocentric research conducted without (re)privileging the human? How does the work in fields that would decenter the human, like critical animal studies, intersect with professional content and practices in fields like education or medicine? How can coalitions be formed (and actions taken) that decenter the human and increase possibilities for all forms of justice, while countering capitalist and technological orders that devalue all forms of life? Interested authors should contact Gaile S. Cannella, gaile.cannella@gmail.com
2 publications